Liberal "solution" to Cho Seung-Hui Murder Spree

John W. Lillpop

In response to the tragic massacre at Virginia Tech, liberals were prepared to renew their clarion call for more gun control laws.

That plan was scrapped when it was disclosed that Virginia Tech already has a no-guns policy in place.

Perhaps Cho Seung-Hui was unaware of the stringent anti-gun rules on campus? If only he had known, things might have been different.

As if someone sick enough to execute 32 innocent people in cold-blooded murder, and then blow his own brains out, would stop to worry about violating gun control laws!

How about the assisted suicide gambit that liberals are constantly promoting?

If only Virginia had an assisted suicide law in place, Cho Seung-Hui would have been able to stroll into a physician's office and get whatever combination of pills and or injections needed to end his miserable existence.

Forget the fact that Cho Seung-Hui was only 23. He obviously deserved to die with dignity, and without all that humiliating news coverage.

Perhaps Cho Seung-Hui was despondent over the fact that he was not getting a tax refund from the IRS this year, even though he probably paid no taxes?

Another example of how the Bush tax cuts for the rich and powerful bite the little guy squarely in the posterior.

Further, one must not overlook the fact Cho Seung-Hui was a person of color. Being a little guy and a racial minority in America these days exposes one to constant discrimination and loss of self-esteem.

Finally, George W. Bush and his "shock and awe" swagger in Iraq have caused impressionable young people like Cho Seung-Hui to rely on violence rather than talking for conflict resolution.

What is the liberal solution to this quagmire?

First, repeal the 2nd Amendment, and replace it with a new constitutional amendment outlawing all dangerous weapons everywhere in the United States.

Second: Require that assisted suicide be made available to any distressed person contemplating the murder of ten or more innocent people.

Third: Repeal all Bush tax cuts, retroactively, and revise the tax code so as to send every college student $1,500 on April 15 each year, and

Fourth: Bring all U.S. troops home from Iraq by Memorial Day 2007 and expunge the terms "shock and awe" and "war on terror" from the English vernacular.

Throw in the impeachment of George Bush and you have a perfectly consistent "solution" from the left to one of the most vexing issues facing contemporary America.



John Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Welcome to the Culture of Corruption, DiFi!

by John W. Lillpop

As originally conceived by Nancy Pelosi and her pals on the loony left, the culture of corruption (COC) was to be the least democratic, least inclusive, and least honorable society in all of Washington, D.C.

Pelosi envisioned that the COC would be the exclusive domain of Caucasian Republican men. That would be scalawags like Tom Delay, Duke Cunningham, Jack Abramoff, Scooter Libby, and hundreds more to be named just in time for the 2006 mid-term elections.

While Pelosi was building her case for the COC as a Republican-only institution, her cohorts in the Democrat Party started misbehaving by slugging Capitol police (Cynthia McKenzie), driving while looped and loaded (Patrick Kennedy), and accepting bribes on video (William J. Jefferson).

And in a new development sure to rock Pelosi's last six plastic surgeries, COC has expanded its membership criteria and now admits Democrat Jewish women.

Senator Diane Feinsten (D-Calif.) is the first COC member in that category owing to her resignation from the Senate's Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee.

Feinstein was chairperson and ranking member of MILCON for six years, during which time she had a conflict of interest due to her husband Richard C. Blum's ownership of two major defense contractors, who were awarded billions of dollars for military construction projects approved by Feinstein.

But, of course, we can rest assured that Pelosi and Harry Reid are working night and day to bring out all the facts in the Feinstein fiasco.

Right?


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Triangulating Military Surrender Into Victory at the Polls

By John W. Lillpop

In their bitter hatred for George W. Bush and unquenchable desire to do real harm to the man, regardless of any impact on America, Congressional Democrats appear to be receiving their legislative marching orders directly from Osama bin Laden.

Both the U.S. House and Senate have now passed Democrat initiated legislation that would effectively tell terrorists to cool their heels until March or September of 2008.

In other words, Osama et al., we surrender but we want to manage the timing of the physical withdrawal so as to make it an integral part of our political campaigns in 2008.

After all, on November 4, 2008, voters will elect a new president, decide all 435 seats in the U.S. House, and vote on a significant number of seats in the Senate.

Given the dynamics of the 2008 elections, why not choreograph the withdrawal so that Katie Couric, Brian Williams, Charles Gibson, and all the rest can devote nightly news segments to the joy of American heroes arriving home safely and being welcomed into the arms of loving family?

Throw in staged clips of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and John Murtha, sobbing hysterically with joy as they welcome American soldiers back home, and you have the potential to move five percent of the undecided vote toward Democrats.

So what if the American withdrawal is seen by America's enemies as a sign that America can be defeated provided one has the guts to fight them in a long, drawn out ground war?

So what if Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad threatens to fill the vacuum left by withdrawing Americans with Jihad throughout the middle east?

So what if the violence in Iraq escalates out of control and threatens the supply of oil to America and her allies?

So what if retreating American armies signal that Israel can no longer count on the U.S. and is now fair game?

Such eventualities can be easily blamed on the stubborn refusal of the Bush administration to cooperate more fully with Democrats. That message would be joyfully delivered by the liberal media without even the slightest hesitation or reality check for objectivity.

The only thing that can sabotage the Democrat plan is something Democrats will work 24/7 to prevent: American victory.

Indeed, the very worse case scenario for Pelosi and Reid would be for the surge to succeed, resulting in an end to the violence, and the stabilization of Iraq.

Victory would validate the policies of George W. Bush and would wreak havoc on Democrats' plans for 2008.

Victory in Iraq is the last thing Democrats want to see happen.

Sad to admit, but Islamofascists appear to have found American politicians whom they can work with to destroy America.

All but a few of those politicians have a D next to their names.


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

Kennedy's Owl: Not a Hoot of Tolerance for Women!

John W. Lillpop

How sweet it is to see a sanctimonious, fat old liberal prone to public drunkenness fall flat on his face because of hypocritical moralizing and grandstanding.

I refer to Theodore Kennedy, Drunk-Mass.

Three years ago, this insufferable loud mouth and favorite son of bartenders all across Washington, D C., attempted to paint Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito as a bigoted racist, owing to the nominee’s membership in a conservative alumni group at Princeton.

Predictably, Kennedy’s witch-hunt for intolerance came up empty. Glory be to God, however, because the ruse actually boomeranged back into the bloated face of the slurring liberal who, it turns out, had diversity skeletons stinking up his own closet.

Indeed, the leftist champion of PC socialism was a member of Owls, an intolerant All Boys club at Harvard that does not admit women.

Why? Simply because they are women!

As it turns out, all those fire and brimstone sermons from Kennedy about equality and tolerance were nothing more than alcohol-blasted hot air from a male chauvinist hypocrite.

In the end, though, Kennedy tried to do the right thing.

He quit Owls, blamed campus Republicans for the misogynist enterprise, and sent $5.00 to the Mary Jo Kopechne memorial fund.


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

What If the ACLU Had Existed on the First Christmas Eve?

by John W. Lillpop

As we Americans struggle to preserve our rich cultural traditions surrounding Christmas, there are times when the struggle seems too hard, the load too heavy.

For example, one wonders if it is worth it upon hearing that another whacked-out liberal judge has determined that the nativity scene is unconstitutional.

The nativity scene is unconstitutional, for heaven’s sake!

Not that long ago, the word unconstitutional was reserved for major injustices that really harmed humanity. For instance, unconstitutional referred to heinous acts like slavery or racial discrimination.

Or what about that character with too much time on his hands who threatened to sue if his religious symbols were not granted equal time and importance to fifteen Christmas trees enjoyed by the overwhelming majority of the public at the Seattle airport? Why would a supposed “man of faith” act to deny so many people the pleasure of seeing a simple, unobtrusive symbol just because the symbol did not represent his particular faith?

How does one confront such narrow-minded, spiteful thinking without going barking mad?

One way is to fantasize what the first Christmas might have been like if liberals and the ACLU had been in charge on the night Jesus was born.

The Christmas story would have been dramatically different:


* Upon entering Bethlehem, Mary and Joseph would have been approached by members of the local Planned Parenthood. Mary would have been encouraged to abort the unborn fetus, and Planned Parenthood would have offered to pay for the procedure with tax money stolen from the Roman government.


* An activist liberal judge in Nazareth would have issued a restraining order to prevent the three wise men from entering the city where the Savior was born.

Citing the lack of any women, blacks, Hispanics, gays, transvestites, or blind and handicapped Buddhists among the three wise persons, the judge would give the wise men three hours to implement an affirmative action plan, or be forced to leave the Holy Land.


* Lawyers from the Bethlehem chapter of the ACLU would have sued the innkeeper who turned Mary and Joseph away. The suit would claim that there was, in fact, plenty of room at the inn, but that Mary was discriminated against solely because she was an unmarried, pregnant, middle-eastern woman who spoke Aramic but not Latin.


* Joseph would have been required to pay a special “Usury Fee”—not a tax, mind you—owing to the fact that the donkey carrying the blessed Mary was not licensed in Bethlehem. The local tax assessor was known in the underground as the “Ass Taxer,” a term that still applies to most Democrats.


* Joseph and Mary would have been forced to leave Bethlehem earlier than originally planned, because a local bureaucrat named Goreish determined that their donkey was releasing unhealthy levels of toxic gases—indelicately called “farts” in our enlightened times.

Such emissions were thought to be a major factor in clinical depressions, and were also implicated in a phenomenon that Goreish called “global warming” which he claimed would surely destroy the earth by the end of the month, at the latest.


If nothing else, we can give thanks for the fact that liberalism and the ACLU did not exist in their present form on that first Christmas Eve.

And that allowed our Creator to give humanity the greatest and most blessed gift of all time!


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

U.S. Route 666: The Devil's Highway to Hell!

by John W. Lillpop

In the way of confession, let me start out by saying that organized religion has never been one of my favorite hobbies. Naked girls, baseball, and Rocky Road ice cream have always kept spirituality near the bottom of my To Do list.

Oh, sure, I believe in the Almighty and all that. But I try to be moderate in all things. Including God, and most especially the whole concept of tithing.

When it comes to dropping my hard-earned cash into a collection plate, I always recall the counsel offered by former FED chair Alan Greenspan when he cautioned against "extravagant exuberance."

Mind you, I rarely take money from the plate, except in dire emergencies.

Actually, my experience with institutionalized religion has been a bit rocky, to say the least.

For example, I still hold that evangelical priest who manacled me to my ex-wife responsible for some of the most miserable years of my life. To say nothing of the $70 a monthly alimony that the surly beach still costs me.

By the way, Mr. Pastor Smarty-pants, next time you wonder why I give so little to your congregation, just remember that $70 per month alimony. I consider that my "tithe," and would appreciate a little more respect!

Still, religion is very important to most Americans. Take the presidential elections for example. Everyone seems in a dither about Mitt Romney because of his Mormonism.

I know from personal experience that most Mormons are good hearted, hard working people who value family very highly.

So highly, in fact, that some Mormon men used to take on six or seven wives just for the sheer joy of having as many families around as possible!

But back to religion. The Holy Bible is an amazing collection of stories, prophecies, and symbols.

Take the Book of Revelations where the "Mark of the Beast" is identified as 666. According to the Bible, the anti-Christ will force everyone to be marked with 666, as a precondition of Armageddon.

By the way, as far as I can tell, George W. Bush is not the anti-Christ. How do I know?

Because the Good Book describes the anti-Christ as clever, cunning, intelligent, and silver-tongued. Does that sound like Duyba to you?

But back to 666.

Americans generally stand true to Christian principles, avoiding pagan rituals, and superstitions at all costs. Witchcraft is usually prohibited, the only exception being the manner by which the Bush administration is allowed to juggle financial data in order to mask the real size of the federal deficit!

But back to 666.

Here is an example of how Americans eschew religious superstition:

For years, U.S. Interstate Highway 666, which travels through scenic areas of Arizona, New Mexico and Colorado, was known as "The Devil's Highway."

In 2003, Highway 666 was renamed Highway 491, but not because of any simplistic or false belief in a connection between 666 and the devil.

In fact, 666 was changed to 491 because of concern by liberals about the constitutional requirement for separation of church and state!

All of which leads to the big question: Is liberalism itself the anti-Christ?



John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Dems Want "Date Certain" for leaving Iraq: Why Fall, 2008?

by John W. Lillpop


Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other assorted liberals like John Murtha in the U.S. House have announced the new Democrat plan for ending the war in Iraq.

Here: http://theconservativevoice.com/ap/article.html?mi=D8NO3FNG0&apc=9008

Mind you, Pelosi et al. are not concerned with winning the war, but want a "date certain" for the U.S. to complete the "cut and run" strategy that liberals are so fond of.

Cynical minds want to know: Why the Fall of 2008?

Perhaps it is just sheer coincidence, but isn't there a presidential election scheduled for November 2008?

And will not all 435 members of the U. S. House and a number of U.S. senators also be up for re-election?

And you thought that Nancy Pelosi was just a San Francisco airhead suffering from Botox poisoning?

In fact, of course, Speaker Pelosi is doing her utmost to get a Democrat elected to the White House. She is also anxious to keep both houses of Congress in the hands of the enemy, especially the U.S. House where Pelosi will be pushing to continue her reign of terror.

What better way to sway American voters than by arranging to bring our troops home just before the elections?

Of course, Pelosi and the liberals will need to be very careful about the timing of their surrender. Pelosi's brilliant strategy could backfire if the middle east devolves into complete chaos with gasoline soaring to $5 a gallon as a result of the U.S. retreat.

Still, there is wide support for the Pelsoi Plan all over the world.

We understand, for example, that the plan is a big hit with cave-dwelling seven-foot terrorists in Afghanistan.

In addition, the Pelosi Plan is said to please Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Of course, Ahmadinejad is Islam's best example of the "Religion of Peace" in action.

How does King Ahmadinejad sound, Ms. Speaker? Wonder how infidels, especially Jews, would fare?


satire by lillpop

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

U.S. House Final Tally: Jihadists 246, U.S. Troops 182

John W. Lillpop

In what will surely go down in history as a dark, dark day for America, the Democrat-run U.S. delivered a staggering blow to our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The vote was 246 for the Jihadists, 182 for U.S. Troops.

Here: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_IRAQ?SITE=WCNC&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Democrats have been wishing for a redux of Vietnam--it looks as though they finally forced it.

Meanwhile, Osama bin Laden, CAIR, the ACLU, the DNC, and other enemies of America are celebrating the U.S. surrender.

To quote one unidentified Jihadist, things have not been this good since Harry Reid "killed" the Patriot Act.

Woe be unto all that love America--she is wobbling and may be about to go down for the count!


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

You Have Never Used the “N” Word? Can You Prove That?

John W. Lillpop

Should Free Speech Be Criminalized?

Because life in the city of Brazoria, Texas, is as close to Heaven as God will allow, Mayor Ken Corley has been forced to create controversy just to assure that Brazoria does not fall into oblivion.

Specifically, the mayor has proposed a city ordinance that would make certain uses of the N word a crime, equal to disturbing the peace and punishable by a fine of up to $500.

The actual language in the ordinance seeks to punish those who use the word in an "offensive manner." Go here:

What, one wonders, would constitute a non-offensive use?

Apparently the ordinance addresses that question somewhat by providing a loophole in instances where the word is used as a "term of endearment."

Talk about creating business opportunities for lawyers! Does Mayor Corley run an employment agency for out-of-work lawyers when he is not proposing outrageous new laws for Brazoria?

As if this N word insanity is not bad enough, Corley has promised to expand his "outlawed words list" in the future.

In the name of diversity, the mayor should add phrases like "white trash," "cracker," and "red-neck hillbilly" to his next ordinance. By doing so, Corley will shield many of my closest friends, at least ones living in Texas.

Or to really tackle the issue head on, Mayor Corley, why not just work to have the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution repealed?


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

On Anniversary of Roe V. Wade, Celebrate Life Before Birth!

By John W. Lillpop


Thirty four years ago, on January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court sanctioned abortion on demand.

Unhappy anniversary to all!

In ruling as they did, the justices became party to a human rights violation of monumental proportions.

Since 1973, 47 million human lives have been exterminated through abortion in the United States. That is nearly eight times the number of Jews who perished at the hands of Adolph Hitler during the Holocaust, and roughly equal to the number of victims slaughtered by Joseph Stalin.

However, unlike those murdered by Hitler and Stalin, the 47 million fetuses killed in America had no political, social, or religious enemies. Rather, they were innocent human lives waiting to experience the blessings of birth.

Those who believe that abortion should be an inalienable right refuse to accept an indisputable fact:

A fetus is human life before birth!

Call that fetus what you wish, the fact remains that it is human life.

Albeit, the fetus is a life without power, voting rights, free speech or any other protection afforded the born. However, it is a human life, nevertheless.

In addition, human life, in all forms, is a precious gift from God regardless of how inconvenient the pregnancy may be.

Abortion, then, is a deliberate, premeditated destruction of one of God’s greatest blessings.

Abortion is a superseding of divine will by mortal will. Those who do so shall be held accountable at a final, and eternal, judgment.

Which is why, even in cases involving the most despicable subhuman killers, our society affords layer-upon-layer of legal review and appeal before using execution as the ultimate punishment.

Unfortunately, while liberals will fight to the bitter end to save the pathetic life of a thug convicted of multiple murders, there is no mercy or fight in them for the unborn--those with life before birth.

May good and righteousness ultimately prevail in the hearts of the American people, and replace a mindset that tolerates abortion on demand with one that celebrates Life before Birth.


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Is Sleeping with a Kennedy un-American?

by John W. Lillpop

What is causing certain powerful Republicans to jump into bed with members of the Kennedy clan?

First it was George W. Bush who, at least metaphorically, cuddled with the Chappaquiddick Anti-lifeguard, also known as Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.)

This Bush-Kennedy mini-group of Alcoholics Anonymous conspired to bring America "No Child Left Behind," which has added nothing but unproductive meddling by incompetent bureaucrats.

Out in California, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's rendezvous with a Kennedy has probably been more intimate, owing to the fact that the Terminator married Maria Shriver whose mother was a Kennedy.

The result has seen Arnold abandon his "moderate" stance in favor of a more "progressive" agenda on issues such as the environment and socialized health care.

Arnold's latest kerfuffle involves a scheme that would mandate health care insurance for all Californians, including those in America illegally.

Known among those who revel in the truth as "No Wetback Left Behind," the Schwarzenegger plan is a potpourri of socialist pap, "free market" double talk, and economic voodoo.

This socialist-inspired manifesto would send small-to-medium sized businesses scrambling to other American states in order to outsource labor needs

California would lose thousands of jobs, but remain stuck with illegal aliens because of the state's foolish policy of providing benefits to those who do not belong in the country, much less being entitled to public services.

Schwarzenegger's experience proves once again that sleeping with a Kennedy relative can ruin one's perspective, wipe out all the common sense that one was born with, and is downright un-American!

Make no mistake about it: Providing health care to illegal aliens is immoral, unfair, and, yes, un-American!

Consider the facts:

Scores of hospitals and medical clinics across the nation have been forced to close because of illegal aliens who cannot, or will not, pay for services received.

Although illegal aliens do not pay for their medical care, Mexicans manage to send about $30-40 billion dollars a year back to Mexico.

So, in effect, American taxpayers are subsidizing health care for illegal aliens so that the invaders can send their money out of the American economy to Mexico, while bankrupting American facilities built for taxpaying Americans!

Why in the world does our government allow such an outrageous practice to continue? Why are monies being sent to Mexico not seized and used to pay for medical services received by illegal aliens?

Even more pertinent: Why in the hell is California's Republican governor advocating a plan that will cause millions of additional illegal aliens to invade America and California?

Why not work to enact legislation that would cause illegal aliens to self-deport back to Mexico?

Come on, Arnold: Do what is right for Kalifornia--even if you have to sleep on the couch for a few nights!

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Dear God: Please Send Global Warming ASAP!

by John W. Lillpop

Just scrambled from out of doors down here in San Jose where the bitter wind and cold bring back awful memories of night baseball at Candlestick park in San Francisco in July or August.

Of course, the wicked wind and cold are all the fault of George W. Bush.

Because of environmental concerns, one can no longer toss a log or two into the fireplace to generate heat. Sweaters, jackets, gloves, ear muffs, headscarves, and windbreakers come, at least partially, from animals butchered by right-wing capitalists for obscene profits. So they are out!

What, then, is one to do?

How about praying for a good blast of global warming right about now? To a non-denominational, non-offensive god, of course!

Feinstein Butts In, Pelosi Butts Out

by John W. Lillpop


Two of the most powerful women in Washington, D.C. are moving in opposite but equally zany directions with edicts and proposed legislation that make it clear that there is an urgent need for priority management classes on Capitol Hill.

To put this discussion in perspective, consider some of the major issues facing America:

* Global war on terror and danger of new attacks on American soil;

* Disarray in Iraq and the president’s plan to send additional troops to Baghdad;

* Threat of Iran and North Korea going nuclear;

* Extremely dangerous dependence on Middle East oil;

* Lack of border security and the presence of 20 million third world criminals in the United States;

* Massive federal debt;

* Medicare and Social Security solvency problems;

* Ballooning trade deficits;

* Plummeting value of the dollar in world markets;

* Strained relations with Russia;

* Growing anti-U.S. sentiment in Latin America, particularly in Venezuela under Hugo Chavez;

* Looming retirement of the “Boomer Generation” and the economic and social implications attendant thereto.

With all of these crucial issues facing them, one would assume that our elected representatives would concern themselves only with matters of utmost national relevance.

But the two women in question, Senator Feinstein and U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, both Democrats from California, have somehow managed to squeeze in some non-essential business.

Speaker Pelosi decided that smoking in the ornate Speaker's Lobby just off the House floor was of such gravity that the personal intervention of the first female speaker in U.S. history was required.

Ignoring the fact that smokers are among the most abused minorities on the planet, Pelosi decided that diversity and tolerance do not extend to those addicted to nicotine, so Her Ladyship turned out the smoking lamp at the U.S. House forever. Go Here

While Pelosi was snuffing out butts at the U.S. House, Comrade Feinstein was working in the U.S. Senate to make law that would allow the federal government to butt into the business and interests of the San Francisco 49ers football team.

Feinstein introduced a bill that would essentially keep the 49ers from doing business in the venue of their choosing, thereby forcing the team to remain in San Francisco. Go here

All things considered, perhaps America is better off when these two out-of touch liberals are consumed with cigarette butts and pro football, rather than issues of vital national interest!


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Measuring One’s Liberal Quotient (satire)

John W. Lillpop
Recognizing when one is a liberal, and knowing the full extent of that devastating mental disorder, is vital information that one should have in order to effectively navigate life’s many obstacles and roadblocks.

Moreover, when medical care or confinement is indicated, it helps when the attending physicians are aware that extraordinary medicines and therapies may be required to combat the liberal DNA responsible for so much psychosis in the world.

This simple, yet scientific, test has been programmed to evaluate one’s “liberal quotient,” which is the exact opposite of intelligence quotient, and usually portends serious mental and moral defects.


The test:

1. Abortion

A. Roe V. Wade, one of America’s great founding fathers, authored Amendment No. 16 to the U.S. Constitution which guarantees women the right to privacy while undergoing an abortion.

In what year was Amendment 16 added to the Bill of Rights?

( ) 1792
( ) 1812
( ) Still being filibustered in the U.S. Senate

B. Abortions should be:

( ) Mandatory for unmarried women under 30.
( ) A real no-no after an expectant mother has started to labor, unless the attending physician can guarantee that law enforcement authorities will not be notified.
( ) Funded by eliminating the Bush tax cuts for the wealty.


2. Global War on Terror
A. The war on terror is:

( ) Based on outright lies and exaggerations by the Bush administration, and, as such, criminal in nature.
( ) Over, kaput. The terrorists have won—Bush should surrender immediately.
( ) Being fought all over the world--except in Iraq.

B. Domestic Surveillance

President Bush has personally listened to calls made and received by Democrats and moderate Republicans. This type of domestic spying is OK as long as the president does not use racial profiling in deciding which calls to eavesdrop on.

( ) True ( ) False


3. Taxes

High taxes:

( ) Stimulate economic growth and create millions of secure, high paying jobs.
( ) Are needed to keep overachievers humble.
( ) Should be paid by any family with an annual income in excess of $7,450.


4. Energy and Dependence on Foreign Oil

A. Drilling for new oil reserves in America is:

( ) Prohibited by the U.S. Constitution.
( ) A grave danger to Alaskan wildlife & ticket
sales for Al Gore’s movie.
( ) Sure to irritate Iran’s president and other Islamic business
leaders whom Bush should be working with, rather than against.
( ) Unnecessary if automobiles are outlawed.

B. Adding additional refining capacity would:

( ) Increase demand, thereby causing more global warming.
( ) Be more immoral than post-birth abortions.
( ) Be fine if built in blue states by brown illegal aliens.
( ) Not be OK because the land is urgently needed for illegal aliens moving here from Mexico.

C. The best option for dealing with the high cost of gasoline is to:

( ) Ignore it. Americans drive too much as it is.
( ) Ignore it because higher prices will drive Bush’s
poll numbers even lower.
( ) Raise gasoline taxes $2.50 per gallon to reduce demand.
( ) Cut off supplies to Red states.
( ) Require each Mexican illegal alien to smuggle in five gallons of gas per month as a condition of the Bush amnesty.

5. Illegal immigration

A. Illegal immigration is:

( ) Desperately needed by liberals in order to win elections.
( ) A misnomer. They are actually undocumented Democrats!
( ) Mexico’s chief export.
( ) Not a threat to U.S. homeland security. Why would Mexican peasants
destroy the land of free rice and tacos?


B. Border security should be:

( ) Ignored, because we need cheap lettuce.
( ) Ignored, because we need cheap lettuce and more Democrats.
( ) Turned over to Felipe Calderon in the name of diversity.
( ) Used to keep Republicans out of the United States.


C. The proposed fence between the United States and Mexico is:

( ) A terrific idea, if built by firms owned by women and minorities.
( ) Unconstitutional. It discriminates against Mexicans too fat to climb over a fence.
( ) “Pork” in Red States, but economic necessity in blue states.

D. Bush’s proposed amnesty:

( ) Is illegal if it prevents Mexicans from collecting welfare.
( ) Will work if guest workers are required to join a labor union.
( ) Should include free health care, driver's licenses, college degrees, and interest-free mortgages for illegal aliens.
( ) Sounds like amnesty, but Mexicans here illegally deserve amnesty!

E. Spanish versus English--Mexican illegal immigrants should:

( ) Be prevented from learning English because the Democrats have printed 30 million ballots in Spanish for the 2008 election.
( ) Be kept English-illiterate to avoid exposure to GOP lies and propaganda.
( ) Be taught vital English words and phrases like welfare, food stamps, ACLU, racism, class-action lawsuit, Vote Democrat, six-pack, etc.

F. Janet Napolitano, Democrat governor of Arizona:

( ) Was for Illegal Immigration before she was against it.
( ) Was a “stealth” candidate in Mexico’s presidential election in early July.
( ) Thinks ''Minutemen'' is a reference to the sexual staying power of Border Patrol agents.

G. In dealing with massive protests by illegal aliens, the most prudent action would be to:

( ) Send a ''Letter of Unconditional Surrender'' to Mexican president Felipe Calderon along with a fully executed Quit Claim Deed to California, Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico.
( ) Pardon all 20 million illegal aliens with an Executive Order signed by President Bush and approved by Felipe Calderon.
( ) Hand out Spanish-language ballots for 2008 with Hillary Clinton’s name pre-punched as a vote for president.
( ) Sell forged driver’s licenses and Social Security cards, and use
proceeds to buy ads opposing the border fence.

6. Using Liberalism to Understand Islam

A. Ramadan:

( ) Was an Islamic religious ritual thousands of years before being commercialized as a national hotel chain—Ramada Inn—by greedy American capitalists.
( ) Is not covered by the constitutional separation of church and state because our founding fathers were all Christian Caucasians—AKA infidels.
( ) Should be observed by non-Muslims, especially obese Americans who need daily fasting just before pigging out at Thanksgiving and Christmas.
( ) Should be a paid, month-long national holiday for union labor and all Democrat operatives with proven liberal credentials.

B. The Koran:

( ) Specifically identifies G.W. Bush as an alcoholic dyslexic and the anti-Allah.
( ) Is available on CD at Democratic National Committee headquarters.
( ) Should be required reading in K-12 to promote religious diversity and sensitivity, and to offset Judeo-Christian propaganda in the Bible.
( ) Calls for Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez to join forces in combating that “evil-doer” G.W. Bush.

C. Mosques:

( ) Are spiritual sanctuaries reserved for holy communion with Allah, except when being used to plan nuclear attacks on the United States or Israel.
( ) Are managed by skilled curators who are experts in certifying Islamic axes for beheading infidels.
( ) Must never be used to store weapons or ammunition except during time of war. Because of infidels, Islam has always been, and will always be, at war.
( ) Must be attended for Friday prayer, except for the faithful who attend mosques destroyed by suicide bombers. (Notice: No fair blowing up a mosque just to get out of Friday prayer!)

D. The practice of rewarding martyrs with 72 virgins:

( ) Makes far more sense that the Christian myth about a virgin giving birth to a Jew who had come to save the world.
( ) Assures that Allah will always have a large contingent of dedicated, virile young men eager to give their very lives for the righteous cause of Islam.
( ) Proves that Christians who promote abstinence are extremists who do not understand spirituality in this life nor the one to follow!
( ) Is proof that welfare reform without a commitment to government- sponsored vocational training is a failed Republican idea.


Congratulations! You have successfully completed this objective assessment of your vulnerability as a practicing liberal.

Because we understand that self-esteem and confidence are very fragile commodities to liberals, we provide neither answers nor grades to this test. This is essential to protect those who may have performed poorly.

But rest assured that you did GREAT-- like everyone else, regardless of sex, nationality, race, language, sexual preference, age, blah, blah, blah!


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

The Torch Has Been Passed--to America-Hating Anarchists

by John W. Lillpop


















After Nancy Pelosi is sworn in as the new Speaker of the U.S. House and Harry Reid as Majority Leader of the U.S. Senate, major parts of the American Dream will be shattered. Some parts of that dream will die.

Among the dead parts: The part that is committed to a strong national defense and victory in the war on terror. The part that loves freedom and less government and promotes personal responsibility. The part that recognizes capitalism as the greatest hope for all peoples to escape the yoke of poverty and oppression. The part that holds to the beliefs of our forefathers in a divine and omnipotent being known as God.

Democrats have not always been so completely anti-American. For instance, on Friday, January 20, 1961, John Fitzgerald Kennedy inspired all of America with an eloquent and powerful inaugural speech.

Go here for the complete text.


Among the new president’s most powerful and reassuring words were these:

” Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans—born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage—and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world. Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.

This much we pledge—and more.”

In that same speech, Kennedy delivered this famous line about serving America:

“And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.”

Why have Democrats drifted so far from the ideals and principles that President Kennedy spoke of in 1961?

What has changed in 46 years to cause this party to become an avowed enemy of the American people?

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Barack Obama IS a Man of “Substance”--Cocaine and Pot, That Is!

by John W. Lillpop

(Satire)
Those who claim that Barack Obama is not a man of substance apparently do not know the man’s background very well.

It turns out Obama is a man of substance—as in Cocaine and pot, that is.

As reported on the front page of the Washington Post this week, Obama confessed to using pot and cocaine, making him the first presidential candidate to admit using cocaine.

Go here:


Obama supporters are quick to point out the saving grace for the charismatic Obama: Namely, he did not inhale the cocaine.

All of this is eerily reminiscent of America’s first black president, the dishonorable William Jefferson Clinton.

Barack Obama, DWB—Drugging While Black!

Lady Frankenstein Comes Back to Haunt Liberal Creator

John W. Lillpop







Cindy Sheehan was the darling of the liberal media and the Democrat Party when she was making headlines by camping outside President Bush’s ranch in Crawford, Texas.

Sheehan became a national celebrity overnight because of her anti-Bush, anti-America propaganda which was perfectly tailored to fit the liberal talking points and the media’s agenda.

Liberals even managed to escalate the pathetic Sheehan into a Nobel Peace prize nominee and, with it, international fame, and glory.

But the liberal version of Frankenstein was created at a time when the only thing Democrats were responsible for was attacking and insulting George W. Bush. Period.

Things have changed dramatically since November 7, and now Democrats are expected to do more than simply blame, bitch, and berate. They are in control now and must produce results or else.

November 2008 is less than two years away, libs, so you better start producing!

That reality came crashing down on the new majority party when Cindy Sheehan and her contingent of outcasts disrupted a Democrat policy meet outside the U.S. House on Wednesday.

Seems as though the left-wing, anti-war nutcases are none too happy with news that Nancy Pelosi et al. have decided not to cutoff funding for the war, and are not in the mood to impeach George W. Bush. Responsible policy will not be tolerated, says Sheehan!

Go here

Although Sheehan and her goons are a despicable and traitorous lot, it is nonetheless gratifying to see the monster hatched by the left come back to consume its irresponsible and foolish creator.

Go Cindy!

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Obama, Osama? What’s the Difference?

John W. Lillpop






CNN made the mistake of televising a graphic that was supposed to read “Where is Osama?” but instead read “Where is Obama?”

Of course, the CNN crowd apologized profusely for the clerical error.

No report is available yet on whether or not Osama has accepted CNN’s apology—but perhaps OBL has switched to FOX now that the Murdock channel has taken a decided left turn, and thus did not catch the CNN mea culpa.

In any event, the CNN mistake was quite understandable. Both Osama and Obama are “men of color,” and both are audacious.

But whereas Osama’s behavior leads to jetliners being rammed into New York skyscrapers and the U.S. Pentagon, Obama’s damage is subtler, less obvious.

Obama is a hazard because of his extreme liberalism and the harm that an Obama administration could inflict on homeland security and economic stability in America.

He is a very charismatic figure in American politics right now, upstaging even luminaries likes Hillary Clinton. His low-key manner and comfortable ways make Obama charming and likeable—qualities not obvious in Senator Clinton.

Most importantly, Obama provides white liberal hypocrites with a black candidate they can comfortably support, thereby relieving some of their guilt over slavery and discrimination.

And that is the true danger of Barak Obama. He is such a compelling personality that people tend to overlook the fact that he comes up short on substance.

In fact, millions of Americans could end up voting for Obama just to feel better about themselves. That is nearly as dangerous as a 7-foot tall terrorist plotting 24/7 in a cave to destroy America!

San Francisco Mayor Says NO! to Democracy

John W. Lillpop

On November 7, San Francisco voters passed Proposition I, which asked the mayor to appear before the Board of Supervisors once a month at a Q-and-A session to discuss city policy. Passage of Proposition 1 sent a clear message that San Francisco voters want their mayor to work with the supervisors, rather than against them.

San Francisco’s current mayor, Gavin Newson, was opposed to the proposition and following passage has thumbed his nose at the non-binding measure. Ever the liberal elitist, Newsom has given every indication that he does not intend to submit to the intellectual and moral snake pit known as the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, notwithstanding the wishes of the voting public.

Newsom’s reticence at a live Q-and-A session should come as no great surprise. His fascistic tendencies were well documented in 2004 when he took it on himself to declare California laws and voters inconsequential on the issue of same sex nuptials.

During that demonstration of manic obsession with power, Newsom personally presided over several same sex weddings on the steps of city hall. Despite all of his theatrics and grandstanding, Newson ended up looking foolish as all of his “weddings” were subsequently ruled null and void.

While it is unclear if Newsom’s modus operandi makes him suitable for higher office, precedent was established by Governor Gray Davis who oozed arrogance when he declared that the role of those in the California state Assembly was merely to implement his ideas.

Further, the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. in Washington, D.C. seems quite adept at ignoring laws he does not agree with.

If being obsessed with rule by fiat is a qualifying factor, perhaps Gov. Newsom, and then President Newsom, are future horrors for California and America.



John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

“Oh, Come Let us Abort Him!”

By John W. Lillpop


The Christmas story is truly the most remarkable and beautiful story ever told.
The fact that an omnipotent Creator would deliver His plan of salvation for humanity through an innocent child wrapped in swaddling clothes is both moving and telling.

After all, He could have used the enormous forces of nature to draw attention to his dissatisfaction with the spiritual shortfall of the species created in His image. A major flood, a devastating string of earthquakes, violent storms and other calamities could have been visited upon the earth and it’s sinful inhabitants.

Instead, He chose to deliver His message of hope and eternal life through a human instrument, in the form of the baby Jesus. The world has never been the same since that Christmas Eve more than 2,000 years ago.

Paradoxically, while the Creator honored humanity with the presence of a child in order to offer eternal life, despicable men and women have decided that some human life is of no more consequence than rancid animal waste.

This willful and arrogant denial of God’s greatest gift—human life—reached it’s most contemptible apex on January 23, 1973, when the United States Supreme Court ruled, in a 7-2 decision, that abortion was a fundamental right bestowed by the United States Constitution.

How strange that the U.S. Constitution, which was crafted by God-fearing men of faith, would be distorted and misrepresented so completely by the most capable and intellectually gifted men of the times.

Following the death sentence imposed on the unborn in 1973, more than 47 million innocent fetuses have been destroyed. Abortions are justified with a variety of reasons: The inconvenience of a pregnancy is the least moral reason for ending a human life through abortion. In situations where a woman has been a victim of rape or incest, more plausible and reasonable justifications are applied.

Regardless of the justification, the fact is that 47 million human spirits have been destroyed through human, rather than divine, intervention.

Which means that the classic Christmas carol titled “Come, Let Us Adore Him,” has literally been changed to “Come, Let Us Abort Him.”

Oh, and by the way, Merry Christmas!