Open Borders, Amnesty: Passion of the Anti-Christ?

By John W. Lillpop


In some of the most convoluted logic and snake oil promotion ever unleashed on the American public, politicians from both parties are screaming that America needs a "Guest Worker" (amnesty) program because of a calamitous shortage of workers in the fields.

In other words, America needs to abandon concerns about rule of law, homeland security, economic and social stability, and American language and culture for cheap labor? And in the case of the Democrats, cheap votes?

Good grief, have politicians in Washington, D.C. lost their collective minds? Should we send the U.S. Marines to Capitol Hill with orders to administer Prozac and insulin shock to any befuddled leader actually speaking in favor of amnesty?

Should the Marines start at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, and then work their way to Congress?

Really, how in the bloody hell can there be a "shortage of workers" in a nation that is overwhelmed and overrun by illegal aliens?

For example, just last April and May, Americans were horrified at the sight of millions of illegal aliens marching through our streets to protest the rule of law.

Remember those images of millions of invaders flying Mexican flags with "Si se puede!" or some other idiotic Spanish gibberish tattooed on their foreheads?

Why not round up these criminals, outfit them with straw hats, picking buckets, and other required farm-work paraphernalia, and ship them to the nearest fields?

Moreover, jail systems throughout America already use incarcerated inmates to clean parks and roadways.

Why not force those here illegally, and in jail or prison, to meet pick grapes and tomatoes 12 hours a day?

This will keep the cost of produce down, and when word of the new program reaches Mexico, may be more effective at ending the invasion than armed troops at the border!

Other venues for locating workers who have no legal or moral basis for being in America include day labor centers, Home Depot stores, welfare offices, food stamp distribution centers, and just about every Jumbo Jack, McDonald's, and Wendy's fast food joint in America.

In addition, Michael Chertoff, my personal choice to play the lead role in Passion of the Anti-Christ when Oliver Stone decides to film it, can help.

Provided he undergoes supervised rehabilitation.

Once Chertoff recovers from his addiction to stupidity, he may be able to understand that American agriculture needs help, and that more than enough help can be provided by rounding up Spanish-speaking burger flippers, bottle washers, and toilet bowl engineers.

Of course, if farmers would pay competitive wages, their labor needs would be met by real Americans--citizens and others here legally.

Indeed, reports indicate that the “shortfall” of agricultural workers is also the result of illegal aliens working in construction and other U.S. industries.

In other words, illegal aliens already here are no longer willing to pick produce and fruit. Talk about bloody cheek!

Finally, much like this nation's addiction to foreign oil, America is addicted to slave labor from the third world.

This addiction represents a major threat to homeland security, national sovereignty, economic and social stability, and preservation of American values and culture.

America needs to end this insidious addiction to slave labor:

* Secure our borders, with military force if needed.

* Deport all illegal aliens currently in the United States.

* Prosecute and punish all business owners that undermine the national security by hiring illegal aliens.

* Hold the Mexican government accountable for its role in the invasion of America by third-world criminals.

By cutting off the flow of illegal aliens, American politicians can do what is right for working families, while at the same time fighting terrorism and preserving American culture.

And that would be mucho bueno!


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Need Immigration Reform? Let's Try Mexico's Immigration Law in U.S.!

by John W. Lillpop


Mexico seems to be wallowing in "Do As I say, Not As I Do" hypocrisy when it comes to immigration laws. Successive presidents and foreign ministers of the nation have called for leniency on the part of the U.S. when it comes to Mexicans coming to America illegally across U.S. borders.

Do Mexican leaders practice what they preach when it comes to, say, an American couple seeking a cheaper, slower-paced lifestyle? Not on your tortilla!

Mexico, according to journalist and terrorist expert Dr. J. Michael Waller, has some of the strictest immigration laws of any country, and they enforce them to the letter.

A link to his commentary.
http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/waller5-8-06.html

Waller informs us that "Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for the U.S. Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill."

Waller adds: "That’s too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue.

Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico."

Waller sharpens his point by commenting on the unnerving tendency of some legal scholars in the U.S. to use foreign laws as a reference point for deciding issues in America.

Waller states, "At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem."

And whereas U.S. laws are often cumbersome, complex instruments fathomable only to lawyers who charge upwards of $300 an hour, things are more to the point in Mexican law.

Again, quoting Waller from the referenced link: "Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:

• In Mexico legally;

• Have the means to sustain themselves economically;

• Not destined to be burdens on society;

• Of economic and social benefit to society;

• Of good character and have no criminal records; and

• Contributors to the general well being of the nation.


"The law also ensures that:

• Authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;

• Foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;

• Foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;

• Foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;

• Foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;

• Those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison."


Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense," Waller states with unassailable logic.

Unfortunately, very little "perfect sense" is obvious in the ongoing debate on immigration reform here in the United States. Rather, the interests of the American people are often ignored or made subordinate by politicians from both parties.

Of greater interest to some in Washington, D.C., is feeding an insatiable corporate appetite for cheap labor, satisfying a wicked lust for cheap votes, and giving in to an inexplicable drive to promote America's decay into a third-world abyss.

These ignoble interests trump rule of law, homeland security, economic and social stability, and preservation of American language and culture in the minds of some elected officials sworn to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution.

By contrast, Waller notes that Mexican law and officials are focused on numero uno--that being Mexico!

Waller writes, "The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens – and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, both illegal and illegal.

"Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or General Law on Population spells out specifically the country’s immigration policy.

"It is an interesting law – and one that should cause us all to ask, 'Why is our southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent?'

"If a felony is a crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

"If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce them as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry."

Waller supports his main thesis by citing key articles of Mexico's main
law.

Again quoting from the commentary at http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/waller5-8-06.html:

"We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. Now let’s look at Mexico’s main immigration law.

"Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:

• Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of
contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)

• Immigration officials must 'ensure' that 'immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance' and for their dependents. (Article 34)

• Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets 'the
equilibrium of the national demographics,' when foreigners are deemed
detrimental to 'economic or national interests,' when they do not behave like
good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and
when 'they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.' (Article 37)

• The Secretary of Governance may 'suspend or prohibit the admission of
foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.' (Article 38)

• Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:

• Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration
authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article
73)

• A National Population Registry keeps track of 'every single individual who
comprises the population of the country,' and verifies each individual’s identity.
(Articles 85 and 86)

• A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:

• Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article
116)

• Foreigners who sign government documents 'with a signature that is false or
different from that which he normally uses' are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)

Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:

• Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)

• Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)

• Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico – such as working with out a permit – can also be imprisoned.

• Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,

• A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five
thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country
illegally. (Article 123)

• Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico
instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)

• Foreigners who 'attempt against national sovereignty or security' will be
deported. (Article 126)

• Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered
criminals under the law.

• A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the
foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)

• Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)"


Waller summarizes his review of Mexican law with this statement: "All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American immigration preaching is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government’s agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States."

Waller concludes his excellent work with a challenge that should be visited upon all 535 members of the U.S. Congress and President Bush as they consider immigration reform.

Waller's challenge:

"Let’s call Mexico’s bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy.

Let’s propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own law as a model."

Congratulations to J. Michael Waller.* His is a voice of sanity that needs to be heard, especially by inmates wandering the halls and cloak rooms of Capitol Hill and 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

*J. Michael Waller is vice president for Information Operations at the Center for Security Policy. A journalist and author, he brings expertise in terrorism, intelligence, the former Soviet Union, and the Americas. He previously served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of State.



John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Of 9/11, Illegal Aliens, and a Muddled President

John W. Lillpop



As America's war on terror president, George W. Bush is perfectly right to be obsessed with homeland security as a means for combating terrorism.

Unfortunately, the president's concern applies only to borders in Iraq and Afghanistan, and not here at home.

Although President Bush has ordered more than one hundred fifty thousand (and counting) American men and women to serve in harm's way 8,000 miles from home, and has spent nearly one half trillion dollars of taxpayer money on the war, he refuses to secure America's borders and to enforce U.S. immigration laws.

The Bush position on illegal aliens seems to be based on the following nonsensical assumptions:

* Only "good hearted, hard working" people cross U.S. borders illegally, and they come only to do work that Americans will not do;

* Illegal aliens share values observed by most Americans: Family values do not stop at the Rio Grande; and

* U.S. borders cannot be secured until a guest-worker program is adopted to relieve "pressure" at the border.

But how can the president advocate on behalf of millions of unknown illegal aliens without the requisite health, background, credit, and criminal checks that must be confronted by legal applicants? Somehow, the president believes that he is able to determine, without specific research, that non-American Latinos wishing to enter the U.S. should be allowed to do so, at will.

Has there ever been a more blatant example of racial profiling?

It is almost as though this president has forgotten that 9/11 even happened.

It is as though he believes that not a single terrorist or potential terrorist has entered America via our unprotected southern border.

Because President Bush refuses to live up to his constitutional responsibility to protect and defend America, even during a time of war, our nation has been invaded by 30 million uneducated, third world, non-English speaking criminals.

Our naive president blithely refers to illegal aliens as "good hearted, hard working" folks who come to America only in search of a better life, but the facts do not support those cliches.

Wasted Lives

As documented in a report by Joseph Farah dated November 28, 2006 and titled "Illegal Aliens Murder 12 Americans Daily," illegal aliens murder an average of 4,380 Americans each year.

In other words, illegal aliens have murdered approximately 21,900 Americans since 9/11. More than seven times the number of Americans who died on that fateful day.

And that does not include the 4,750 Americans killed by drunken illegal aliens every year! That adds up to another 23,725 "wasted lives," since 9/11.

Go here:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53103


Clearly, politicians genuinely concerned about "wasted lives" should work to secure our borders, enforce existing laws, and deport all criminal illegal aliens.


Los Angles: Illegal Alien and Crime Capitol of America

Some startling facts and figures from the Los Angeles Times and other news outlets should cause any sane person to question the president’s judgment when it comes to criminals from Mexico.

For example:

* 40% of workers in Los Angeles County work for cash and pay no taxes, because they are predominantly illegal aliens without green cards.

* 95% of murder warrants issued in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens.

* 75% of those on the “most wanted” list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens.

* Over 67% of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal aliens.
(Mexican births paid for by U.S. taxpayers.)

* Nearly 25% of all inmates in California detention centers are here illegally.

* Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.

* 50% of gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border, according to FBI reports.

* 60% of all occupants in HUD properties are illegal aliens.

* 21 radio stations in Los Angeles are Spanish-language.

* In Los Angeles County, 5.1 million people speak English, while
3.9 million speak Spanish.

* Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but 29% are on welfare.

* In 1997, the net cost of immigration to American taxpayers was $70 billion. The lifetime fiscal impact (taxes paid minus services received) for the average adult Mexican immigrant is a negative number.

* 29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens.

It is well past time for America's elected officials to forsake their illogical concern for illegal aliens, and to focus instead on protecting the interests of the American people as required by the U.S. Constitution.


Illegal Aliens Share American Values?

Although the president is fond of saying that illegal aliens share American values, the exact opposite is true.

Most Americans are not criminals who cross borders illegally and steal public services to which they are not entitled. ALL illegal aliens are!

Americans value the great English language--illegal aliens generally refuse to learn English.

As to the president's mindless prattle about "Family Values," two recent stories contradict that foolishness rather emphatically.

Take the case of Albert Vidal Torres, of Ontario, California. This shining example of "Family Values" has been charged with sprinkling glass and other debris into Chinese vegetable dumplings that were shipped to markets throughout California.

Prosecutors also believe that Torres contaminated the dumplings with seeds, pebbles, and spit. Torres must have left his "Family Values," if he ever had any, at the Rio Grande.

And, yes, Albert Vidal Torres, is an illegal alien. This Third World monster should not have even been in the United States to begin with.

Then we have the story of Jason Okon, a three-year Army veteran who was awarded a Bronze Star for valor in Iraq. This genuine American hero recently returned from Iraq and was in the process of making a new life for himself.

Okon's plans for pursuing the American Dream were abruptly halted by
Armando Martinez-Lozano. According to Okon's wife, Jason was doing some yard work when Martinez-Lozano approached Jason with a knife and said something to him in Spanish.

When Okon told Martinez-Lozano to leave, the other man allegedly stabbed Okon in the stomach and ran away. Okon was taken to Good Samaritan Hospital, where he remains in the intensive care unit. He is comatose and on a ventilator.

Martinez-Lozano was arrested by police and jailed on charges of aggravated assault against Okon and the three officers who arrested him.

As with Torres, Armando Martinez-Lozano is an illegal alien.

Yet another third world thug who was able to assault an American hero because George W. Bush does not want to apply too much "pressure" on our borders.

Albert Vidal Torres and Armando Martinez-Lozano are not statistical aberrations. In fact, as noted earlier illegal aliens kill 25 Americans a day through murders, drunken driving, and other violent crimes.

Illegal aliens are "good hearted, hard working" folks whose "Family Values" are as American as baseball, hot dogs, and apple pie. Right?

Perhaps our president needs to educate himself as to the likes of Albert Vidal Torres and Armando Martinez-Lozano.

Or does George W. Bush just not care?


From Baghdad to Arizona: Borders DO Matter!

Iraqi officials have apparently learned something that seems beyond the grasp of President Bush.

Specifically, Lt. Gen. Abboud Gambar, Iraqi commander of Baghdad security, has announced that Iraq would close its borders with Syria and Iran.

What a concept!

Imagine that, actually taking action to keep enemies out during time of war. This could actually mean that Iraq is finally getting serious about defeating the insurgents, thereby bringing some civility to this hellhole.

But what about a guest worker program, Lt. Gen.? Don't you know that by putting too much "pressure " on the border, you will only exacerbate the inflow of enemies into your nation?

At least that is the theory of America's great intellect and war strategerist, George W. Bush.

Of course, the "Bush Doctrine" has lead to America being inundated with 30 million peasants from the third world, but remember, "Family Values do not stop at the border."

And like the third world criminals who have invaded America, the Syrian and Iranian thugs headed to Iraq are probably "good hearted, hard working" insurgents--once you get to know them.

Here is more free, but invaluable, advise from the bully pulpit of George W. Bush:

Rather than securing your borders, why not create a guest worker program for all insurgents now in Iraq, and establish a program that allows insurgents in-waiting from Syria and Iran to come as guest workers?

Mind you, this is NOT amnesty! Never, ever, use the word amnesty when Bush double-talk will do.

Complete the Bushwacking of Iraq by giving all insurgents free education, health care, housing, food, and a path to immediate citizenship.

In short order, there will be more insurgents than Iraqi citizens in Iraq, but at least they will all be fed, educated, and healthy!

Illegal Aliens Are NOT Immigrants!

Those arguing on behalf of illegal aliens and their “rights”
often play word games in appealing to the pride of real Americans.

“Immigrants Built America” and “We are all Immigrants” are popular slogans at pro-illegal alien protests and in jargon used by those who favor open borders, regardless of the impact on America’s homeland security, economy, or culture.

What the anti rule-of-law crowd omits is the crucial word "legal," as in "legal immigrants." While it’s true that we are all descendants of immigrants, it is not true that our forefathers came to America illegally.

America was not built by illegal aliens!

Migrating to America legally is, and should be, a long, drawn-out procedure meant to protect the interests of American citizens. It involves more than simply jumping a fence and heading north in pursuit of free health care, education, food stamps, and other handouts paid for by U.S. taxpayers.

Legal immigration means enduring rigorous hurdles like background checks to detect a criminal background or possible ties to terrorists.

It means medical examinations to detect diseases still prevalent in third-world nations, but long since eradicated here.

It means proof of financial solvency so as to prevent newcomers from becoming a burden on U.S. taxpayers, and

It means passing tests for knowledge of American history and English skills.

Those who have jumped the fence into America in order to avoid our immigration checks are not immigrants.

Rather, they are illegal aliens, with no claim whatsoever to the welcome mat extended to legal immigrants.

Such people do not deserve recognition or sanction by the United States, and should be rounded up and deported as soon as possible, without exception.

Another word game played by pro-illegal aliens is to call these miscreants “undocumented." The implication of this term is that the invaders are simply missing a piece of paper or two, probably some unnecessary bureaucratic red tape designed to keep brown people out.

In truth, illegal aliens have invaded our nation, leaving America vulnerable to undetected crime, terrorism, disease, and financial devastation at the hands of people with no legal or moral justification for being here.

Do not be fooled by word games and euphemistic cover-ups.

People here illegally are illegal aliens. Period!


America Don't Need No Stinkin' Reform!

With all due respect to President Bush and his Mexican handlers and underwriters, America does NOT need immigration reform, comprehensive or otherwise.

What this nation desperately needs is a President and Congress that will apply due diligence on behalf of America, rather than working solely for huge U.S. corporations, illegal aliens, and the Mexican government.

In other words, Mr. Bush, you can solve the immigration nightmare overnight by simply living up to your constitutional responsibility to defend America “against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

Or to put it more succinctly, Mr. President, secure our borders and enforce existing immigration laws. Period!

Forget about “comprehensive” reform, which is nothing more than code-speak for amnesty.

The president is reportedly a student of history. Perhaps he would benefit by boning up on recent immigration history.

Namely:

In 1986, the United States adopted the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) (Simpson-Mazzoli Act, IRCA, and Pub. L. 99-603, Nov. 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 3359).

IRCA was enacted to reduce illegal immigration, which was a problem for the American economy. Three million illegal aliens were granted amnesty as a result of IRCA.

The new law would have worked--if it had been enforced. Unfortunately, both Democrat and Republican administrations have failed (refused?) to enforce the IRCA.

As a result, twenty years later America is saddled with upwards of an additional 30 million illegal aliens.

Most distressing is the fact that the “surge” from south of the border continues unabated, in spite of 9/11 and the threat posed by terrorists.

Apparently the president would have the American people believe that securing the borders 8,000 miles from home is vital to U.S. homeland security, but that securing our own borders is not vital.

And how can that be, Mr. President?

Is it because, in your mind, illegal aliens are “good hearted, hard working folks” simply looking for a better life?

And does that description also apply to the scores of millions of third-world peasants still in Mexico and other Latin nations, thinking of heading north to America?

All are good hearted and hard working? Without a single Jihadist, or potential terrorist, in their midst?

The 1986-amnesty disaster proves that America needs secured borders and rigid enforcement of our laws.

Or, to put the issue in terms even most illegal aliens could understand:

America don't need no stinkin' reform!


Why is it Impossible to Deport Illegal Aliens, Mr. Bush?

President Bush has undertaken the onerous task of converting Muslim dictatorships and theocracies in the Middle East into enlightened democracies.

The president apparently believes that America can, and should, determine the form of government that billions of Muslims live under.

But while our commander-in-chief is downright eager to impose American ideology on billions of Muslims in nations thousands of miles removed from our shores, he is downright squeamish when it comes to defending America's own borders and enforcing our immigration laws.

Most distressing is Bush's assertion that deportation of millions of illegal aliens is “impossible.”

How in the world can it be “impossible” for the most powerful and technologically advanced nation in the world to remove criminals who have invaded our nation at time of war?

Surely the greatest hope for the civilized world in the global “war on terror” is not helpless when it comes to criminals inside its own borders? Some of who are most likely terrorists?

If America is really that impotent, Osama bin Laden and other Islamofascists will see that as great news, and a source of inspiration for continuing their Jihad on the civilized world.

Moreover, if America is unable, or unwilling, to control who enters and who stays here, victory for terrorism and world domination by Islamic extremists are all but assured.

Is that really the message you wish to convey to the world, Mr. President?

The great-unanswered question in all of this is:

Why does President Bush always act on behalf of illegal aliens, rather than America?

Why does he arrogantly and foolishly deny the truth?

Namely, illegal aliens:

* Feed at the public trough for health care, education, food, housing and other vital services to which they were not entitled.

* Overwhelm American hospitals, medical clinics, and emergency rooms and refuse to pay for medical services received.

* Force medical facilities into bankruptcy, resulting in the loss of vital medical services for American citizens.

* Manage to send $30-40 billion a year back to Mexico while dumping their medical bills on the backs on U.S. taxpayers.

* Refuse to learn English, and demand that America provide services in Spanish at considerable cost to American citizens.

* Impede the education of American children because of language and cultural issues.

* Demand driver’s licenses despite being in America illegally, and demand that driver instruction and testing materials be in Spanish.

* Demand reduced tuition rates offered to American students here legally.

* Vote in U.S. elections and alter election results.

* Overwhelm America's penal system, making it impossible to deal effectively with the citizen inmate population.

* Engage in wholesale forgery of vital public documents and commit identity theft in order to secure employment, education, credit, and access to public services.

* Take to the streets to protest pending legislation that would tighten border security and enforce the nation’s immigration laws

* Wave the Mexican flag and scream “Yes, we can!” and “We are America" in Spanish as they march to protest the rule of law in America

* Cry “racism” every time they are criticized for being in America illegally or challenged to learn English and assimilate into American society.

In other words, this corrupt bunch of third-world banditos is under the misguided notion that America has no sovereign rights or borders, and that our great nation should be open to every Mexican peasant that decides unilaterally to squat in America.

And the government of Mexico has violated the sovereignty and borders of America by encouraging millions of illiterate peasants to invade America.

Again, the unanswered question: Why does U.S. President George W. Bush consistently side with Mexico and illegal aliens, instead of fighting on behalf of Americans?


Deport Them All--Including Anchor babies!

Illegal aliens who scheme to have anchor babies born in America just to avoid justice (through deportation) are among the most despicable criminals in our midst.

Only Democrat and RINO politicians are less honorable.

By callously manipulating infants for personal gain, illegal aliens clearly lack the moral values and judgment essential to being good Americans. Unless one is planning on becoming a Democrat politician.

Moreover, the presence of anchor babies gives weak-minded knot heads who favor open borders and non-enforcement of immigration laws a lame excuse for doing nothing.

Again, infants are manipulated for political purposes by those who scream "We cannot split families," when arguing against deportation.

However, that argument is embarrassingly specious.

To begin with, illegal aliens willfully abandon family when they leave their nation of origin, usually Mexico, in order to invade America!

Apparently, "Family" is trumped by dinero when deciding whether or not to jump a fence to pursue the mother lode, AKA free public services, in America!

Secondly, deportation decisions cannot be based on whether or not the offending criminal has a family.

Consider a parallel: Illegal aliens are like bank robbers--they steal property belonging to others. However, when an American citizen is found guilty of robbing a bank, does the presiding judge decide against prison because of concern about separating the criminal from family?

Of course not!

Criminals are criminals, and should be dealt with according to the law, especially when it comes to illegal aliens.

Third: Who says that the illegal alien family has to be split? For illegal aliens with children under 18, it should be mandatory that the entire family be deported!

In fact, because they are the most burdensome to American taxpayers, deporting such families should be the greatest priority of our federal government.

In other words, Pancho, get the hell out and take your moochachoo brats with you!

Finally, instead of trying to rip-off the government with demands for lavish air travel, Speaker Pelosi should work with other Twinkies like Senator Harry Reid to close the anchor baby loophole with respect to children of illegal aliens.


America Needs Redux of "Operation Wetback"

America has not always been governed by a pro-illegal alien president who works on behalf of big business and the Mexican government.

Our CEO has not always been willing to sacrifice homeland security for cheap fruit. We have not always been cursed with a sell out who bases all of his immigration policy on a philosophy of "No Wetback Left Behind."

There was a time when our president really cared about American sovereignty, borders, culture, and language.

The last best example of this was during the administration of Republican Dwight Eisenhower, under whom which "Operation Wetback" was launched.

The following description of "Operation Wetback" is from The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fifty-three years ago, when newly elected Dwight Eisenhower moved into the White House, America's southern frontier was as porous as a spaghetti sieve. As many as 3 million illegal migrants had walked and waded northward over a period of several years for jobs in California, Arizona, Texas, and points beyond.

President Eisenhower cut off this illegal traffic. He did it quickly and decisively with only 1,075 United States Border Patrol agents--less than one-tenth of today's force. The operation is still highly praised among veterans of the Border Patrol.

Although there is little to no record of this operation in Ike's official papers, one piece of historic evidence indicates how he felt. In 1951, Ike wrote a letter to Sen. William Fulbright (D) of Arkansas. The senator had just proposed that a special commission be created by Congress to examine unethical conduct by government officials who accepted gifts and favors in exchange for special treatment of private individuals.

General Eisenhower, who was gearing up for his run for the presidency, said "Amen" to Senator Fulbright's proposal. He then quoted a report in The New York Times, highlighting one paragraph that said: "The rise in illegal border-crossing by Mexican 'wetbacks' to a current rate of more than 1,000,000 cases a year has been accompanied by a curious relaxation in ethical standards extending all the way from the farmer-exploiters of this contraband labor to the highest levels of the Federal Government."

Years later, the late Herbert Brownell, Jr., Eisenhower's first attorney general, said in an interview with this writer that the president had a sense of urgency about illegal immigration when he took office.

America "was faced with a breakdown in law enforcement on a very large scale," Mr. Brownell said. "When I say large scale, I mean hundreds of thousands were coming in from Mexico [every year] without restraint."

Although an on-and-off guest-worker program for Mexicans was operating at the time, farmers and ranchers in the Southwest had become dependent on an additional low-cost, docile, illegal labor force of up to three million, mostly Mexican, laborers.

According to the ''Handbook of Texas Online,'' published by the University of Texas at Austin and the Texas State Historical Association, this illegal workforce had a severe impact on the wages of ordinary working Americans. The ''Handbook Online'' reports that a study by the President's Commission on Migratory Labor in Texas in 1950 found that cotton growers in the Rio Grande Valley, where most illegal aliens in Texas worked, paid wages that were "approximately half" the farm wages paid elsewhere in the state.

Profits from illegal labor led to the kind of corruption that apparently worried Eisenhower. Joseph White, a retired 21-year veteran of the Border Patrol, says that in the early 1950s, some senior U.S. officials overseeing immigration enforcement "had friends among the ranchers," and agents "did not dare" arrest their illegal workers.

In 1954, Ike appointed retired Gen. Joseph "Jumpin' Joe" Swing, a former West Point classmate and veteran of the 101st Airborne, as the new INS commissioner.

Then on June 17, 1954, what was called "Operation Wetback" began. Because political resistance was lower in California and Arizona, the roundup of aliens began there. Some 750 agents swept northward through agricultural areas with a goal of 1,000 apprehensions a day. By the end of July, over 50,000 aliens were caught in the two states. Another 488,000, fearing arrest, had fled the country.

By mid-July, the crackdown extended northward into Utah, Nevada, and Idaho, and eastward to Texas.

By September, 80,000 had been taken into custody in Texas, and an estimated 500,000 to 700,000 illegals had left the Lone Star State voluntarily.

Unlike today, Mexicans caught in the roundup were not simply released at the border, where they could easily reenter the United States. To discourage their return, Swing arranged for buses and trains to take many aliens deep within Mexico before being set free.

Tens of thousands more were put aboard two hired ships, the Emancipation and the Mercurio. The ships ferried the aliens from Port Isabel, Texas, to Vera Cruz, Mexico, more than 500 miles south.

The sea voyage was "a rough trip, and they did not like it," says Don Coppock, who worked his way up from Border Patrolman in 1941 to eventually head the Border Patrol from 1960 to 1973.

-------------------------------------------------------

By contrast, in 2007 we are stuck with a president who refuses to enforce our borders and deport the illegal aliens who are destroying America. During a time of war no less!


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

A Pandemic of Stupidity South of the Border!

Is Mexico Governed by Complete Idiots?


By John W. Lillpop


With 30 million third-world Mexican illegal alien peasants dumped on the backs of U.S. taxpayers, one would expect Mexican officials to keep their mouths shut about border violation issues. You know, do not bring up a subject that will expose your own criminality and vulnerability.

But Mexico is obviously a land of pandemic stupidity.

What else can one conclude after learning that Mexico's Congress has condemned what it says is a border violation by U.S. workers building a controversial barrier between the two countries?

Here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6390291.stm

Can you imagine-- Mexico complaining about the U.S. and borders?

In order to resolve this issue intelligently, American officials should pose the following questions to the complaining Mexican officials:


* Did the United States violate the sovereignty and borders of Mexico by encouraging 30 million illiterate American peasants to cross the border illegally?

* Did American illegal aliens feed at the public trough for health care, education, food, housing and other vital services to which they were not entitled, and which cost Mexican taxpayers hundreds of billions of pesos each year?

* Did American illegal aliens overwhelm Mexican hospitals, medical clinics, and emergency rooms and refuse to pay for medical services received?

* Did the impact of serving American illegal aliens force scores of medical facilities into bankruptcy, resulting in the loss of vital medical services for Mexican citizens?

* Did American illegal aliens who refused to pay for medical services manage to send $30-50 billion a year back to the United States?

* Did American illegal aliens refuse to learn Spanish, and demand that Mexico provide services in English at considerable cost to Mexican citizens?

* Did the children of American illegal aliens slow down and otherwise impede the education of Mexican children because of language and cultural issues?

* Did American illegal aliens demand driver’s licenses despite being in Mexico illegally? Did they demand that driver instruction and testing materials be in English?

* Did American illegal aliens demand the same reduced tuition rates offered to Mexican students there legally?

* Did American illegal aliens vote in Mexican elections and alter election results?

* Did American illegal aliens overwhelm Mexico’s penal system, making it impossible to deal with the citizen inmate population?

* Did the largest state in Mexico contract with another Mexican state for the housing and care of 15,000 inmates because of the impact of American illegal aliens?

* Did American illegal aliens engage in wholesale forgery of vital public documents and commit identity theft in order to secure employment, education, credit, and access to public services?

* Did American illegal aliens in Mexico in 1986 receive amnesty in an attempt by the Mexican government to end illegal migrations once and for all?

* Did the Mexican government refuse to enforce the provisions of the amnesty, thereby causing the American illegal alien problem to grow ten times greater in the span of 20 years?

* Did millions of American illegal aliens take to the streets to protest pending legislation in the Mexican congress that would tighten border security and enforce the nation’s immigration laws?

* Did American illegal aliens wave Old Glory and scream “Yes, we can!” and “We are Mexico!” in English as they marched to protest the rule of law in Mexico?

* Did American illegal aliens cry “Racism” every time they were criticized for being in Mexico illegally or challenged to learn Spanish and assimilate into Mexican society?

Obviously, none of the above is correct, although each and every item would provide more than adequate justification for military action against Mexico by the U.S.

In other words, this corrupt bunch of third-world banditos in Mexico is under the misguided notion that America has no sovereign rights or borders, and that our great nation should be open to every Mexican peasant that decides unilaterally to squat in America.

Wake up, America! Mexico is a foreign enemy of the United States.


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

An Open Letter to John McCain

By John W. Lillpop

February 3, 2007

Senator John McCain
Washington, D.C.

Dear Senator McCain,

Enclosed herewith please find your "Presidential Agenda Survey." You will note that the survey has not been completed.

You will also note that I have not enclosed a donation to your campaign.

In all honesty, Senator, I was very disappointed to see that the issue of illegal immigration is very last on your list, while border security is next to last. It is as if these issues were after thoughts, included only to fill the page.

Clearly, you do not fully appreciate the gravity of these issues, particularly to conservatives.

Perhaps I am being naive. After all, you conspired with Ted Kennedy in crafting the amnesty bill passed by the Senate last May 25.

That bill, in my opinion, is an outrageous sell out of American sovereignty, language, and culture to third-world criminals who have invaded America and who have no basis for being here.

Senator, with all due respect, how can America claim to be serious about the war on terror when our borders are not secured?

How can any elected official who has taken an oath to defend and protect America against all enemies, foreign and domestic, refuse to demand enforcement of ALL U.S. laws, including those pertaining to immigration?

To be perfectly blunt, I would vote for you without the slightest hesitation--were it not for your outrageous (again, my view) position on illegal immigration.

Many conservatives and Republicans agree with me.


Senator McCain, you are a genuine war hero! No one contests that.

I thank you for your incredible service to America while in the armed forces. No one in American politics even approaches your sterling record of dedicated military service.

At the same time, it must be recognized that the America that you fought for, and sacrificed so much to preserve, exists only because we live under the rule of law.

Your sacrifices will be meaningless if the rule of law is abandoned, as will be the case if our borders and laws are not enforced!

America does NOT need immigration reform. However, we desperately need a president and Congress who will enforce our borders and existing laws. And we need a government that will work on behalf of the American people, rather than for invading criminals.

In closing, I cannot honestly wish you good fortune in your presidential bid. A McCain administration, given your current positions on illegal immigration, would be nearly as problematic for America as a Hillary Clinton administration.

Except for the fact that Hillary is a heck of a lot easier on these aging eyes.

I do you wish you good health and success in the career of your choice, provided it does not involve America's borders or immigration laws.

Should you unexpectedly alter you views, I would be delighted to re-consider your candidacy, complete that Presidential Agenda Survey," and perhaps even make a donation!

Sincerely,


John W. Lillpop
San Jose, California

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Too Much "Pressure" on America's Borders?

John W. Lillpop

After listening to the State of the Union speech by President Bush, I have been blessed with an extraordinary idea; one with the potential to change the way banking is conducted everywhere. Forever.

I refer to the president's statement concerning the illegal alien crisis and America's open borders. The president said, in part, "We cannot fully secure the border unless we take pressure off the border."

Mind you, there are skeptics who would question the president's assertion that there is too much "pressure" at the border, given the fact that there are about 30 million illegal aliens squatting in America right now.

Still, I suppose that from Bush's perspective, America could be blessed with another 100 million illegal aliens or so, were it not for all that "pressure" at the borders.

Remember, George W. Bush is a graduate of the Yale MBA program, so he must know what he is talking about. Right?

That being the case, I believe we should give the Bush scheme a chance in reforming America's banking institutions.

Bankers can show their patriotism by making the following changes:

* Leave all bank vaults wide open, 24/7;

* Remove all remote video recording and security alarm equipment;

* Fire all security guards paid to safeguard bank money; and

* Discontinue the discriminatory practice of performing background checks on individuals beings considered for employment.

Come on, financial professionals, follow the lead set by our president, and abandon your "stodgy, conservative" image.

Welcome to the Dubya world of "Pressure-free" banking!

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

The State of the Union: An Ordinary Citizen Responds

John W. Lillpop


As required by the U.S. Constitution, President Bush delivered the "State of the Union" speech in January. The Bush speech was annunciated in Texan--that is, pidgin English with a drawl.

After the president has spoken, the Democrats responded, in both English and Spanish.

All of the speeches were loaded with outrageous hyperbole and exaggerations, if not downright lies. The real problems facing the nation were grossly underestimated or ignored. Achievements were vastly overstated and misrepresented.

In other words, the State of the Union focused on what politicians wanted Americans to think, rather than the actual state of the union.

For a change, our politicians need to hear the State of the Union from the perspective of an ordinary American citizen.

This citizen proposes the following response:

Mr. President, members of Congress:

The state of this union is: In grave peril and in danger of collapse!

Due to inappropriate actions and or inaction on the part of those entrusted with managing this great nation--that would be YOU, ladies and gentlemen--the United States of America is on the brink of declining into a third-world cesspool.

It is imperative that our government recognize the fact that we the people are FED UP with the attempt to undermine American sovereignty, homeland security, and culture.

In short, we the people are:


FED UP with plans to merge the United States into a North American alliance with Canada and Mexico. Such a plan would destroy American sovereignty and is totally unacceptable.

FED UP with the refusal of the federal government to secure our borders at time of war.

FED UP when armed Mexicans illegally cross our borders and assault Americans, yet our government takes no action, and refuses to even protest.

FED UP when Americans defending the U.S. from drug smuggling illegal aliens are sent to federal prison, while invading criminals are to be forgiven via amnesty for violating our borders and laws.

FED UP with the fact that upwards of 30 million illegal aliens are currently in America, and cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars every year.

FED UP with a president who orders thousands of young Americans into harm's way thousands of miles from home, but who refuses to secure America.

FED UP with politicians who refuse to enforce immigration laws and who claim it is "impossible" to deport criminals here illegally.

FED UP with illegal aliens who can not and/or will not speak English.

FED UP with taxpayer dollars being wasted to print documents in foreign languages.

FED UP with illegal aliens who dump their medical bills on the backs of U.S. taxpayers, but who send $30-40 billion a year back to Mexico each year.
FED UP with the fact that providing free medical services to illegal aliens drives hospitals out of business, making those facilities unavailable to American citizens for whom the medical centers were intended.

FED UP with our schools being invaded by non-English speaking children who impede the learning process of students who genuinely belong here.

FED UP with the fact that federal, state, and local penal systems are overrun by illegal aliens, again costing taxpayers billions each year.

FED UP with the fact that, on average, illegal aliens kill 12 Americans every day.

FED UP with the fact that the overwhelming majority of felony crimes being investigated in Los Angeles have been committed by illegals from Mexico.

FED UP with politicians who refuse to round up and deport millions of illegal aliens who are destroying American culture and language.

FED UP with politicians who pamper illegal aliens with driver's licenses and free public services, which encourage even more invaders to come to America.

FED UP with the attempted Mexicanization of America. Mexico is a third- world slum, and we are FED UP with those who want America to be like Mexico!

Finally, Mr. President and members of the U.S. Congress, we the people are FED UP with those who consistently work on behalf of illegal aliens and the state of Mexico, and against the interests of the American people!

Please do not underestimate the dissatisfaction and rage swelling in the hearts of patriotic Americans on this vital issue.

The state of this union is untenable and must not continue as is!

We the people DEMAND our great country back!

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

The "Mexicanization" of America, Courtesy of George W. Bush

By John W. Lillpop

Does the notion that President Bush is actively working for the Mexicanization of America seem to be an exaggeration?

Consider the Bush record:

* Refuses to secure the U.S. border;

* Refuses to act, or even comment on, incursions into America
by armed Mexicans;

* Refuses to enforce existing immigration laws;

* Supports amnesty for 20 million illegal aliens in America;

* Wants to provide illegal aliens with Social Security benefits;

* Opposes making English the official American language;

To enforce his non-enforcement of U.S. borders and laws, Bush has installed Alberto Gonzales as the Attorney General of the United States.

Gonzales, the offspring of illegal aliens from Mexico, has no interest whatsoever in preventing the flow of third-world peasants into America.

After all, those poor invading peasants are his fellow countrymen!

In addition to the Gonzales travesty, Bush has appointed Senator Mel Martinez as the new chair of the Republican National Committee. Martinez is an open borders, pro-illegal alien activist who could care less about America.

George W. Bush, Alberto Gonzales, and Mel Martinez: Two banditos and one gringo working for the Mexicanization of America!


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Is George W. Bush a Mexican Mole?

John W. Lillpop

January 17, 2007 should go down in American history, along with December 7, 1941 and September 11, 2001, as days on which the United States was brutally attacked.

Although America was not physically attacked on January 17, the devastation to our republic was nearly as grave.

For on January 17, 2007, Jose Alonso Compean and Ignacio Ramos, former border patrol agents, will be sent to federal prison for defending the United States against an illegal alien from Mexico as that criminal was attempting to smuggle drugs into America.

Let me repeat: On January 17, 2007, American citizens were sent to prison for defending America against invasion by criminals from Mexico.

Even more distressing is the fact that our president, who has taken an oath to defend and protect America against all enemies, refused to intervene on behalf of Compean and Ramos, and on behalf of the American people.

This bitterly sad story promises to get much, much uglier.

With anti-American anarchists in control of the United States Congress, President Bush will be able to complete his fire sale of America to business interests by granting amnesty to 20 million illegal aliens.

Fast forward to mid-February, 2007, for a moment:

A breaking news bulletin interrupts regular broadcasting during prime time. Television cameras zoom in on the White House where a historic piece of legislation is being about to become law by virtue of approval by President Bush.

At the center of the stage sits the president, smiling broadly at the Democrats and RINOs who joined him in acting on behalf of Mexico and against the interests of the American people.

The assembled traitors will include Democrat senators Reid, Kennedy, Boxer, and Feinstein, and Republicans Frist and McCain.

The U.S. House will be represented by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the Sanchez sisters, and other advocates for criminal invaders.

With a stroke of his presidential pen, President Bush will grant legal status to the 20 million illegal alien criminals who have invaded America since 1986, when wholesale amnesty was last granted.

Once Bush is finished, former illegal aliens will comprise anywhere from 3-8% of the total United States population.

Nearly all of the “hardworking, goodhearted” illegal aliens that Bush will legalize will vote Democrat for the remainder of their lives, thereby effectively ending the two party system in America.

Mexicans still living in Mexico, but disenchanted with life there, will see the latest amnesty as a sure sign that invading America can be accomplished with impunity.

It will be abundantly clear that America’s “conservative” president is actually a Mexican mole pretending to be loyal to America.

Scores of millions of additional illegal aliens will head north with little or no concern for U.S. borders and immigration laws.

George W. Bush will go down in history as the president who actively campaigned for the surrender of America to third-world foreigners.

He will be remembered as the president who discarded American sovereignty, rule of law, language, and culture in exchange for cheap lettuce and fruit.

He will also be remembered as the president who sent American men and women 8,000 miles from home to fight for Iraq and Afghanistan, but who refused to defend the American people at our southern border.

As Bush affixes his signature to the amnesty law and congratulates his co-conspirators for their efforts on behalf of 20 million criminals, remember what America did to American citizens Jose Alonso Compean and Ignacio Ramos on January 17.

And say a prayer in remembrance of America's lost sovereignty and descent into the morass of third-world existence.


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Hispanically Speaking, Bush's English Ain't Two Haught. Sew Watt?

By John W. Lillpop

In the midst of the inflamed rhetoric swirling around illegal immigration last summer, President Bush tried to cool things off by calling for immigrants to learn English as part and parcel of becoming American, and to enhance their chances of living the American Dream.

While Bush's call for immigrants to learn English was a good thing, it was also amusing: One can only hope that impressionable illegal aliens do not use our president as a model for English articulation.

Although Bush is perhaps the worstest* communicator in our history, he is, in fact, trilingual, and proficient in:

Mexican
Spanish, and
Texan. Otherwise known as pidgin English with a drawl.

Ultimately, Bush's Spanish-Mexican language skills may benefit him if, God forbid, his amnesty giveaway becomes law.

Indeed, if America is bushwhacked on immigration again, illegal aliens from Mexico will soon outnumber U.S. citizens--on the American side on the border.

At that happy day, at least Bush will be able to remind the millions of squatters that he is so fond of that they are a decent, good-hearted, hard-working majority.

Bush will be able to deliver his message in Spanish-Mexican--or depending on the education level of his audience, Mexican Spanish!

America will thus die, Hispanically Speaking.

*(From the Dubya dictionary of contemporary Texas language arts.)

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Measuring One’s Liberal Quotient (satire)

John W. Lillpop
Recognizing when one is a liberal, and knowing the full extent of that devastating mental disorder, is vital information that one should have in order to effectively navigate life’s many obstacles and roadblocks.

Moreover, when medical care or confinement is indicated, it helps when the attending physicians are aware that extraordinary medicines and therapies may be required to combat the liberal DNA responsible for so much psychosis in the world.

This simple, yet scientific, test has been programmed to evaluate one’s “liberal quotient,” which is the exact opposite of intelligence quotient, and usually portends serious mental and moral defects.


The test:

1. Abortion

A. Roe V. Wade, one of America’s great founding fathers, authored Amendment No. 16 to the U.S. Constitution which guarantees women the right to privacy while undergoing an abortion.

In what year was Amendment 16 added to the Bill of Rights?

( ) 1792
( ) 1812
( ) Still being filibustered in the U.S. Senate

B. Abortions should be:

( ) Mandatory for unmarried women under 30.
( ) A real no-no after an expectant mother has started to labor, unless the attending physician can guarantee that law enforcement authorities will not be notified.
( ) Funded by eliminating the Bush tax cuts for the wealty.


2. Global War on Terror
A. The war on terror is:

( ) Based on outright lies and exaggerations by the Bush administration, and, as such, criminal in nature.
( ) Over, kaput. The terrorists have won—Bush should surrender immediately.
( ) Being fought all over the world--except in Iraq.

B. Domestic Surveillance

President Bush has personally listened to calls made and received by Democrats and moderate Republicans. This type of domestic spying is OK as long as the president does not use racial profiling in deciding which calls to eavesdrop on.

( ) True ( ) False


3. Taxes

High taxes:

( ) Stimulate economic growth and create millions of secure, high paying jobs.
( ) Are needed to keep overachievers humble.
( ) Should be paid by any family with an annual income in excess of $7,450.


4. Energy and Dependence on Foreign Oil

A. Drilling for new oil reserves in America is:

( ) Prohibited by the U.S. Constitution.
( ) A grave danger to Alaskan wildlife & ticket
sales for Al Gore’s movie.
( ) Sure to irritate Iran’s president and other Islamic business
leaders whom Bush should be working with, rather than against.
( ) Unnecessary if automobiles are outlawed.

B. Adding additional refining capacity would:

( ) Increase demand, thereby causing more global warming.
( ) Be more immoral than post-birth abortions.
( ) Be fine if built in blue states by brown illegal aliens.
( ) Not be OK because the land is urgently needed for illegal aliens moving here from Mexico.

C. The best option for dealing with the high cost of gasoline is to:

( ) Ignore it. Americans drive too much as it is.
( ) Ignore it because higher prices will drive Bush’s
poll numbers even lower.
( ) Raise gasoline taxes $2.50 per gallon to reduce demand.
( ) Cut off supplies to Red states.
( ) Require each Mexican illegal alien to smuggle in five gallons of gas per month as a condition of the Bush amnesty.

5. Illegal immigration

A. Illegal immigration is:

( ) Desperately needed by liberals in order to win elections.
( ) A misnomer. They are actually undocumented Democrats!
( ) Mexico’s chief export.
( ) Not a threat to U.S. homeland security. Why would Mexican peasants
destroy the land of free rice and tacos?


B. Border security should be:

( ) Ignored, because we need cheap lettuce.
( ) Ignored, because we need cheap lettuce and more Democrats.
( ) Turned over to Felipe Calderon in the name of diversity.
( ) Used to keep Republicans out of the United States.


C. The proposed fence between the United States and Mexico is:

( ) A terrific idea, if built by firms owned by women and minorities.
( ) Unconstitutional. It discriminates against Mexicans too fat to climb over a fence.
( ) “Pork” in Red States, but economic necessity in blue states.

D. Bush’s proposed amnesty:

( ) Is illegal if it prevents Mexicans from collecting welfare.
( ) Will work if guest workers are required to join a labor union.
( ) Should include free health care, driver's licenses, college degrees, and interest-free mortgages for illegal aliens.
( ) Sounds like amnesty, but Mexicans here illegally deserve amnesty!

E. Spanish versus English--Mexican illegal immigrants should:

( ) Be prevented from learning English because the Democrats have printed 30 million ballots in Spanish for the 2008 election.
( ) Be kept English-illiterate to avoid exposure to GOP lies and propaganda.
( ) Be taught vital English words and phrases like welfare, food stamps, ACLU, racism, class-action lawsuit, Vote Democrat, six-pack, etc.

F. Janet Napolitano, Democrat governor of Arizona:

( ) Was for Illegal Immigration before she was against it.
( ) Was a “stealth” candidate in Mexico’s presidential election in early July.
( ) Thinks ''Minutemen'' is a reference to the sexual staying power of Border Patrol agents.

G. In dealing with massive protests by illegal aliens, the most prudent action would be to:

( ) Send a ''Letter of Unconditional Surrender'' to Mexican president Felipe Calderon along with a fully executed Quit Claim Deed to California, Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico.
( ) Pardon all 20 million illegal aliens with an Executive Order signed by President Bush and approved by Felipe Calderon.
( ) Hand out Spanish-language ballots for 2008 with Hillary Clinton’s name pre-punched as a vote for president.
( ) Sell forged driver’s licenses and Social Security cards, and use
proceeds to buy ads opposing the border fence.

6. Using Liberalism to Understand Islam

A. Ramadan:

( ) Was an Islamic religious ritual thousands of years before being commercialized as a national hotel chain—Ramada Inn—by greedy American capitalists.
( ) Is not covered by the constitutional separation of church and state because our founding fathers were all Christian Caucasians—AKA infidels.
( ) Should be observed by non-Muslims, especially obese Americans who need daily fasting just before pigging out at Thanksgiving and Christmas.
( ) Should be a paid, month-long national holiday for union labor and all Democrat operatives with proven liberal credentials.

B. The Koran:

( ) Specifically identifies G.W. Bush as an alcoholic dyslexic and the anti-Allah.
( ) Is available on CD at Democratic National Committee headquarters.
( ) Should be required reading in K-12 to promote religious diversity and sensitivity, and to offset Judeo-Christian propaganda in the Bible.
( ) Calls for Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez to join forces in combating that “evil-doer” G.W. Bush.

C. Mosques:

( ) Are spiritual sanctuaries reserved for holy communion with Allah, except when being used to plan nuclear attacks on the United States or Israel.
( ) Are managed by skilled curators who are experts in certifying Islamic axes for beheading infidels.
( ) Must never be used to store weapons or ammunition except during time of war. Because of infidels, Islam has always been, and will always be, at war.
( ) Must be attended for Friday prayer, except for the faithful who attend mosques destroyed by suicide bombers. (Notice: No fair blowing up a mosque just to get out of Friday prayer!)

D. The practice of rewarding martyrs with 72 virgins:

( ) Makes far more sense that the Christian myth about a virgin giving birth to a Jew who had come to save the world.
( ) Assures that Allah will always have a large contingent of dedicated, virile young men eager to give their very lives for the righteous cause of Islam.
( ) Proves that Christians who promote abstinence are extremists who do not understand spirituality in this life nor the one to follow!
( ) Is proof that welfare reform without a commitment to government- sponsored vocational training is a failed Republican idea.


Congratulations! You have successfully completed this objective assessment of your vulnerability as a practicing liberal.

Because we understand that self-esteem and confidence are very fragile commodities to liberals, we provide neither answers nor grades to this test. This is essential to protect those who may have performed poorly.

But rest assured that you did GREAT-- like everyone else, regardless of sex, nationality, race, language, sexual preference, age, blah, blah, blah!


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

National Guard Attacked at Border: Where in the Hell Is Bush?

By John W. Lillpop

As if the fall of the U.S. Congress into the hands of the enemy is not bad enough, Americans need to worry about the traitorous malfeasance of George W. Bush as well.

Consider please:

This nation has sacrificed tens of thousands of American lives and casualties, and nearly one half trillion dollars of treasury in the name of U.S. homeland security in Iraq and Afghanistan.

After nearly four years of war in Iraq, America’s alleged commander-in-chief is reportedly ready to deploy another 20-40,000 U.S. men and women and hundreds of additional billions of U.S. treasury to Iraq. He is also said to be ready to juggle the assignment of military field commanders there.

Meanwhile here at home, the National Guard stationed at the Arizona border was attacked, presumably by Mexican thugs.

In other words, U.S. personnel have been attacked on American soil by foreigners. No doubt they were good hearted, hard working foreigners who only came for a better life!

Consider this also:

It is reported that in 2004, the Bush administration and Mexico entered into an agreement, not yet approved by Congress or signed by the president, that would results in billions of dollars being paid to illegal aliens in the form of social security benefits.

That would be the same social security system that is in danger of going bankrupt in the future, according to the president. Go here:

In other words, the Bush administration has decided to jeopardize the security and retirement of millions of American citizens even further by paying benefits to criminals who should not have even been in America.

With all due respect to the office of the U.S. presidency, it appears as though the man now holding that title has gone barking mad.

The big question: Is insanity a viable defense by a sitting president charged with treason?

Dear America: What Will You Do When G.W. Bush Surrenders to Mexico?

John W. Lillpop

Picture the ugly scene, if you have the heart and or stomach:

A breaking news bulletin interrupts regular broadcasting on all major networks during prime time. Television cameras zoom in on the White House where a historic piece of legislation is being about to become law by virtue of approval by President G.W. Bush.

At the center of the stage sits President Bush, smiling broadly at the Democrats and RINOs who made amnesty for illegal aliens possible. That would include Democrat senators Reid and Kennedy, and Republicans McCain and Graham. The U.S. House would be represented by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the Sanchez sisters, and other advocates for illegal aliens.

With a stroke of his presidential pen, G. W. Bush will grant legal status to the 12-30 million illegal alien criminals who have invaded America since 1986, when wholesale amnesty was last granted.

Once Bush is finished, former illegal aliens will comprise anywhere from 3-8% of the total United States population.

Nearly all of the “hardworking, goodhearted” illegal aliens that Bush will legalize will vote Democrat for the remainder of their lives, thereby effectively ending the two party system in America.

Mexicans still living in Mexico, but disenchanted with life there, will see the latest amnesty as a sure sign that invading America can be accomplished with impunity. It will be abundantly clear that America’s “conservative” president is adamant in his refusal to enforce U.S. borders and immigration laws.

Thus, scores of millions of additional illegal aliens will head north with little or no concern for U.S. borders and immigration laws.

G.W. Bush will go down in history as the president who actively campaigned for the invasion of America by foreigners from a third-world nation. He will be remembered as the president who discarded American sovereignty, rule of law, language, and culture in exchange for cheap lettuce and fruit.

He will also be remembered as the president who sent American men and women 8,000 miles from home to fight for Iraq and Afghanistan, but who abandoned the American people at our southern border.

Finally, G.W. Bush will be remembered as the president who abandoned the Republican party and consigned it to permanent minority status.

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

President Ponders Pardons—For Illegal Aliens!

By John W Lillpop









The latest wacky news in the ongoing war against illegal aliens has two border patrol "soldiers" headed for prison because they had the audacity to enforce U.S. immigration laws.

This unbelievable miscarriage of justice has raised the ire of some in the U.S. House of Representatives. Twelve members of that deliberative body have written President Bush to request pardons for Cardo Jose Alonso Compean (sentenced to 12 years in prison) and Ignacio Ramos (sentenced to 11 years and one day). [WorldNetDaily]

Although the intentions of the representatives are good and honorable, one shudders at the possibilities that might ensue once their letter lands on the president's desk in the Oval Office.

Remember, our president is dyslexic, which means that sometimes he zigs when he should zag. Or vice versa.

Therefore nobody should be too surprised if the president signs an executive order to deport border patrol agents Cardo Jose Alonso Compean and Ignacio Ramos to Mexico, while also approving a blanket pardon for the 20 million illegal aliens here in America.

All of which proves a basic truth about George W. Bush: Never misunderestimate his cunning ability to develop strategeries that will aid and abet illegal aliens. Hispanically speaking, that is just how our 43rd president is wired!

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable! Writing is his passion. He loves creating lively copy with irony and humor!

Another “Embarrassment” for Vicente Fox!

By John W. Lillpop




President Vicente Fox announced Saturday he was sending federal security forces into the violence-wracked southern state capital of Oaxaca after a U.S. journalist and two Mexican men were killed by gunfire.

Go here:

Mind you, this is the same moron who called the U.S. border fence an “embarrassment” to America!

Vicente Fox should stop trying to run America and focus instead on preventing Mexicans from killing Americans in Mexico!

Oh, and by the way, has anyone heard from our president—G.W. Bush—about the murder of an American in 3rd-world Mexico? Bush is the president that should be sending troops—American troops—into Oaxaca!

Or is Bush too dang busy pushing amnesty for 20 million illegal aliens to bother himself with the homicide of an American in Mexico?


John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Tan Nguyen Was Right!

By John W. Lillpop





In the midst of all the controversy surrounding Tan Nguyen and his famous letter to Hispanics, how many people actually read the “offending” letter? My guess is darn few.

The letter has been translated into English and is reproduced below.

Dear ----------,

You are receiving this letter because you have recently registered to vote. If you are a U.S. Citizen, I urge you to participate in the democratic process of voting.

Be advised that if your residence in the United States is illegal or if you are an emigrant, voting in a federal election is a crime that can result in incarceration, and possible deportation for voting without the right to do so.

In the same way, be advised that the U.S. government is installing a new computerized system to verify names of all the newly registered voters who participate in the elections in October and November. Organizations against immigration will be able to request information from this new computerized system.

Not like in Mexico, here there is no benefit to voting. In the United States there is no registration card to vote. Therefore, it is useless and dangerous to vote in any election if you are not a citizen of the United States.

Do not pay attention to a politician who may try to tell you otherwise. They only care about their own interests. They just want to win elections and it doesn't matter to them what happens to you.

Sincerely,

Sergio Ramirez

http://www.theliberaloc.com/pdf/theletterenglish.pdf


After reviewing the letter itself, it is clear that Nguyen's staff is simply reminding citizens to vote and non-citizens not to vote. What is wrong with that, for heaven's sake?

Rather than harassing Tan Nguyen for doing the right thing, the more appropriate action would be to ask Loretta Sanchez why she has not sent a letter like this to the Hispanic community herself!

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

President Ponders Pardons—For Illegal Aliens!

By John W. Lillpop







The latest wacky news in the ongoing war against illegal aliens has two border patrol “soldiers” headed for prison because they had the audacity to enforce U.S. immigration laws.

This unbelievable miscarriage of justice has raised the ire of some in the U.S. House of Representatives. Twelve members of that deliberative body have written President Bush to request pardons for Cardo Jose Alonso Compean (sentenced to 12 years in prison) and Ignacio Ramos (sentenced to 11 years and one day).

Go here: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52607

Although the intentions of the representatives are good and honorable, one shudders at the possibilities that might ensue once their letter lands on the president’s desk in the Oval Office.

Remember, our president is dyslexic, which means that sometimes he zigs when he should zag. On occasion, he inadvertently (?) gets things backwards

Therefore nobody should be too surprised if the president signs an executive order to deport border patrol agents Cardo Jose Alonso Compean and Ignacio Ramos to Mexico, while also approving a blanket pardon for the 20 million illegal aliens here in America.

All of which proves a basic truth about George W. Bush: Never misunderestimate his cunning ability to develop strategeries that will aid and abet illegal aliens. Hispanically speaking, that is just how our 43rd president is wired!

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!

Mexico's Immigration Law: Let's Try it Here at Home!

By John W. Lillpop




This article should be an eye opener, especially to those who object to enforcement of U.S. borders and laws.

Mind you, this is the law of the land in the nation that has threatened to take the U.S. to the UN for building a fence on American soil!

By J. Michael Waller **

Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for the U.S. Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill.

That’s too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue.

Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem.

Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:

• In Mexico legally;

• Have the means to sustain themselves economically;

• Not destined to be burdens on society;

• Of economic and social benefit to society;

• Of good character and have no criminal records; and

• Contributors to the general well being of the nation.


The law also ensures that:

• Authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;

• Foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;

• Foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;

• Foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;

• Foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;

• Those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.


Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense.

The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens – and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, both illegal and illegal.

Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or General Law on Population spells out specifically the country’s immigration policy.

It is an interesting law – and one that should cause us all to ask, “Why is our southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent?”

If a felony is a crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce them as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry.


We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. Now let’s look at Mexico’s main immigration law.

Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:

• Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of
contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)

• Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)

• Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the
equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed
detrimental to “economic or national interests,” when they do not behave like
good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and
when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)

• The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of
foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)

• Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:

• Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration
authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article
73)

• A National Population Registry keeps track of “every single individual who
comprises the population of the country,” and verifies each individual’s identity.
(Articles 85 and 86)

• A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:

• Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article
116)

• Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is false or
different from that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)

Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:

• Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)

• Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)

• Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico – such as working with out a permit – can also be imprisoned.

Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,

• “A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five
thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country
illegally.” (Article 123)

• Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico
instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)

• Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty or security” will be
deported. (Article 126)
Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered
criminals under the law:

• A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the
foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)

• Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)

All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American immigration preaching is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government’s agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States.

Let’s call Mexico’s bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy.

Let’s propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own law as a model.

Any guess as to which nation would object the loudest to such a proposal?

** Go here for complete text

John W. Lillpop is a reecovering liberal.