Sunday, December 19, 2010
Tidings of Great Joy from U.S. Senate: DREAM Act Defeated!
By John W. Lillpop
Merry Christmas to American citizens from the United States Senate!
By defeating the DREAM Act, the Senate has delivered a clear, powerful message to illegal aliens here and, more importantly, to tens of millions contemplating unlawful migration north.
The message:
The most deliberative body in the world, i.e., the United States Senate, has affirmed that America remains committed to the rule of law and equal justice for all.
That means that our borders and immigration laws must be honored by those wishing to come here.
In simple English, illegal is illegal.
Regrettably, some special interest groups use influential, moneyed lobbyists to seek special benefits (DREAM Act) for those who do not belong here.
These interest groups are often driven solely by the desire to increase the numbers of a specific race, rather than in advancing the overall American economy, homeland security, and our unique cultural heritage.
Doling out special benefits to illegals while millions of equally bright, talented people are forced to wait in line is NOT the American way.
That tenet of American fairness was affirmed on the floor of the Senate today.
In addition, tens of millions of Americans are in economic and employment crisis.
Basic fairness demands that taxpayer monies NOT be spent on illegal aliens when there is so much unaddressed need among our citizens!
To illegal aliens disappointed by this vote, a word of admonition:
Resist the urge to blame the failure of DREAM on racism, bigotry, or America jingoism.
The fact of the matter is that America is the most welcoming and generous nation ever. Those who come here legally are greeted with open arms and warm hearts, regardless of race, religion, or nationality.
Moreover, remember that America has been inundated by tens of millions of illegal aliens, mostly from Mexico, who cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars each year.
Many invading illegals refuse to assimilate into American culture and have little or no desire to learn English. Others remain politically and culturally loyal to their nation of origin.
That is also NOT the American way!
Standing up for the rule of law IS the American way and we thank the Senate for defeating the anti-American DREAM Act!
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Is Amnesty Dead? If So, What Next?
By John W. Lillpop
Open borders advocates, and those who fret over illegal aliens forced to live in the shadows, are in a deep dither over the election results because the leftist plan to reward millions of illegal aliens with amnesty, known euphemistically as “Comprehensive” Immigration Reform, may be dead in the water for the near term.
Which explains that “loud sucking sound,” which is the noise made by tens of millions of moon bats wringing their corrupt hands in unison as Democrat politicians rue the latest turn of events.
How dare those haughty Americans ignore the contributions of tens of millions of poor, non-English speaking invaders who cost taxpayers more than $100 billion dollars a year?
All because of flimsy concerns about American national sovereignty, secure borders, homeland security, preservation of American language and culture, and the rule of law?
What to do? they wail in righteous indignation!
Alas, there is a relatively simple solution, although its simplicity may not curry much favor among those who wish to re-make America into a suburb of Tee-Juana!
The Sane Solution: Enforce the bloody law!
Its official title is the “Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986", and this jewel was put on the books the last time America’s elitists decided that our nation faced a desperate shortfall of menial laborers.
IRCA came about as a trade for amnesty granted to the 3-4 million invading criminals from Mexico in 1986.
IRCA was supposed to put an end, once and for all, to the illegal invasion of America. That would require enforcement of IRCA, a notion that no administration, neither Democrat nor Republican, has even vaguely pondered.
With a new, more conservative U.S. House and Senate due in town in January, it is time for duly-elected politicians to enforce IRCA in full, including deportation of the 12-38 million foreign illegal aliens who have come here since IRCA was signed into law.
Time to give rule of law, including IRCA, a chance!
Open borders advocates, and those who fret over illegal aliens forced to live in the shadows, are in a deep dither over the election results because the leftist plan to reward millions of illegal aliens with amnesty, known euphemistically as “Comprehensive” Immigration Reform, may be dead in the water for the near term.
Which explains that “loud sucking sound,” which is the noise made by tens of millions of moon bats wringing their corrupt hands in unison as Democrat politicians rue the latest turn of events.
How dare those haughty Americans ignore the contributions of tens of millions of poor, non-English speaking invaders who cost taxpayers more than $100 billion dollars a year?
All because of flimsy concerns about American national sovereignty, secure borders, homeland security, preservation of American language and culture, and the rule of law?
What to do? they wail in righteous indignation!
Alas, there is a relatively simple solution, although its simplicity may not curry much favor among those who wish to re-make America into a suburb of Tee-Juana!
The Sane Solution: Enforce the bloody law!
Its official title is the “Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986", and this jewel was put on the books the last time America’s elitists decided that our nation faced a desperate shortfall of menial laborers.
IRCA came about as a trade for amnesty granted to the 3-4 million invading criminals from Mexico in 1986.
IRCA was supposed to put an end, once and for all, to the illegal invasion of America. That would require enforcement of IRCA, a notion that no administration, neither Democrat nor Republican, has even vaguely pondered.
With a new, more conservative U.S. House and Senate due in town in January, it is time for duly-elected politicians to enforce IRCA in full, including deportation of the 12-38 million foreign illegal aliens who have come here since IRCA was signed into law.
Time to give rule of law, including IRCA, a chance!
Tuesday, October 05, 2010
Help Wanted: $23/hour Menial Labor Must Be US Citizen
By John W. Lillpop
Former President George W. Bush was fond of arguing that illegal aliens were not stealing jobs from Americans because the invaders were doing work that citizens would simply not do.
That specious argument, accepted by RINOs, leftists, and the mainstream media, has been effectively debunked thanks to legal shyster Gloria Allred and her illegal alien client Nancy Diaz, and their wicked attempt to destroy Republican Meg Whitman.
As a result of Allred’s slimy nanny-abuse chasing on behalf of Jerry Brown, we now know that Nancy Diaz was paid $23 dollars an hour for cleaning Whitman’s home.
At 40 hours a week, that adds up to $47,840 a year!
Not bad for a “good-hearted, hard-working” invader with limited English skills, no education and a penchant for lying and falsifying legal documents.
In fact, Diaz’s gig was so good that one wonders how many citizens would be willing to do her job?
Imagine an employment ad reading as follows:
“Help Wanted. Housekeeping, menial labor. $23 an hour. Must be U.S. citizen.”
In the Obama economy, such an ad would probably draw tens of thousands of applicants, perhaps significantly more, anywhere in the nation, including affluent and sophisticated areas like San Francisco Bay Area, Boston, Chicago, and New York City.
All the more reason why ICE should arrest and deport Diaz immediately, and begin immediate action to deport ALL illegal aliens.
The big question: With 15 million Americans out of work, why in the hell are Obama and his Marxist allies in Congress pushing amnesty for invading criminals like Nancy Diaz?
Former President George W. Bush was fond of arguing that illegal aliens were not stealing jobs from Americans because the invaders were doing work that citizens would simply not do.
That specious argument, accepted by RINOs, leftists, and the mainstream media, has been effectively debunked thanks to legal shyster Gloria Allred and her illegal alien client Nancy Diaz, and their wicked attempt to destroy Republican Meg Whitman.
As a result of Allred’s slimy nanny-abuse chasing on behalf of Jerry Brown, we now know that Nancy Diaz was paid $23 dollars an hour for cleaning Whitman’s home.
At 40 hours a week, that adds up to $47,840 a year!
Not bad for a “good-hearted, hard-working” invader with limited English skills, no education and a penchant for lying and falsifying legal documents.
In fact, Diaz’s gig was so good that one wonders how many citizens would be willing to do her job?
Imagine an employment ad reading as follows:
“Help Wanted. Housekeeping, menial labor. $23 an hour. Must be U.S. citizen.”
In the Obama economy, such an ad would probably draw tens of thousands of applicants, perhaps significantly more, anywhere in the nation, including affluent and sophisticated areas like San Francisco Bay Area, Boston, Chicago, and New York City.
All the more reason why ICE should arrest and deport Diaz immediately, and begin immediate action to deport ALL illegal aliens.
The big question: With 15 million Americans out of work, why in the hell are Obama and his Marxist allies in Congress pushing amnesty for invading criminals like Nancy Diaz?
Monday, April 12, 2010
Call Them What They Are--Invading Criminals!
By John W. Lillpop
As if the Democrats' mad rush to remake America into a third-world colony of Mexico were not bad enough, mindless liberals actually want to scrap the First Amendment by banning use of the term "Illegal Alien."
The PC-preferred term is "undocumented worker" or "undocumented immigrant" which are intended to deliberately skirt the issue of criminal invasion.
However, illegal aliens Are NOT immigrants!
Migrating to America (legally) is, and should be, a long, drawn-out procedure meant to protect the interests of American citizens. It involves more than simply jumping a fence and heading north in pursuit of free health care, education, food stamps and other handouts paid for by U.S. taxpayers.
Legal immigration means enduring rigorous hurdles like background checks to detect a criminal background or possible ties to terrorists.
It means medical examinations to detect diseases still prevalent in third-world nations, but long since eradicated here, and
It means proof of financial solvency so as to prevent newcomers from becoming a burden on U.S. taxpayers.
Those who have jumped the fence into America in order to avoid our immigration checks are not immigrants.
In truth, people who come here illegally leave America vulnerable to undetected crime, terrorism, disease, and financial devastation. And they have no legal or moral justification for being here.
Why engage in silly word games and euphemistic cover-ups?
People here illegally are illegal aliens and need to leave ASAP.
Period!
Friday, January 08, 2010
Stimulus Did Not Work in 2009, Is Not Working in 2010!
By John W. Lillpop
Those hoping for an Obama fairy-tale beginning to 2010 were bitterly disappointed by the latest jobs news.
As reported at Yahoo.com, in part: (1)
“WASHINGTON (AP) -- Lack of confidence in the economic recovery led employers to shed a more-than-expected 85,000 net jobs in December even as the unemployment rate held at 10 percent. The rate would have been higher if more people had been looking for work instead of leaving the labor force because they can't find jobs.
“The sharp drop in the work force -- 661,000 fewer people -- showed that more of the jobless are giving up. Once people stop looking for jobs, they're no longer counted among the unemployed.
“When discouraged workers and part-time workers who would prefer full-time jobs are included, the so-called "underemployment" rate in December rose to 17.3 percent, from 17.2 percent in November. That's just below a revised figure of 17.4 percent in October, the highest on records dating from 1994.”
Imagine that: 10.0 percent unemployment and 17.3 percent under employment--all for just one trillion dollars of stimulus pork! What a deal!
Another 85,000 out of work and this president and liberals in Congress want to grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, many whom hold jobs that should be filled by Americans!
How about a win-win proposal that will help America and clean up the illegal alien mess all at once?
The win one for America proposal: Put US citizens who are unemployed to work in hunting down and deporting illegal aliens and in assisting border patrol agents secure our borders.
Say what? That would be unfair and discriminatory?
Yep, it sure would. But then again, so is allowing 20 million illegal aliens to steal hundreds of billions of dollars each year from US taxpayers.
How about some unfair and discriminatory actions by the government in favor of hard-working, tax-paying US citizens for a change?
(1)http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Economy-loses-more-jobs-apf-2245188994.html?x=0&.v=8
Sunday, December 27, 2009
Frequently Asked Questions About ObamaCare
Satire by John W. Lillpop
Moon bats who voted for Barack Obama are obviously delighted that the U.S. Senate has approved the commie health scheme known as ObamaCare on the morn of Christmas Eve.
However, many are confused and do not realize that the House and Senate must reconcile any differences before a final bill can be submitted to the president. Others are not informed as to the effective dates and coverage terms.
The following list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) was hacked from DNC computers and shows the answers that Democrat voters are being fed:
Q: My next health insurance premium is due on January 5, 2010. Should I pay it, or will Obama handle it for me?
A: Registered Democrats and Independents who voted for ‘Bama are automatically covered as of 1/1/2010. President Obama has requested that instead of wasting more money on insurance premiums, these folks should make a generous, tax-deductible contribution to the Democrat party. Write “Ben Nelson-Mary Landrieu payoffs” on your check.
Registered Republicans and Independents who voted for John McCain will not be covered under ObamaCare until their 65th birthday or five years following the president’s signature, whichever comes first. Such people must continue to pay their overpriced premiums or risk a $5,000 annual fine and five years in jail.
Q: I am an illegal alien from Latin America who desperately needs transsexual surgery to align my sexual plumbing with my natural urges and instincts. I am bilingual, but only in Spanish and Mexican.
Am I covered, and when can I trade my useless penis for replacement parts that will set me free?
A: Good news, Pedro! As it turns out, you are covered as of 1/1/2010, just like the dopey American citizens who will end up paying for your switch.
To qualify, simply provide proof of your illegal alien status to the attending surgeon at least twenty minutes before anesthesia is administered.
One word of caution: Do not speak even a single word of English. Doing do may disqualify you immediately.
Q: I am eight plus months pregnant with twin boys. The father and I are not married and we have agreed that I will get an abortion. From a financial view, should we have the abortion in 2009 or wait until 2010?
A: We cannot dispense medical advice, but recommend that you ask your physician if he or she can guarantee that your brats will not pop out before January 1, 2010.
If premature delivery is not a risk, we advise waiting until mid-January to nuke the brats. By doing so, you will automatically qualify for the ObamaCare late-term rebate, which can save you thousands!
Q: Mother is 54 years old and in need of bypass heart surgery. She is still very active in GOP politics including her role as a top fundraiser for Sarah Palin. What are her options under ObamaCare?
A: We recommend that Mum apply for assisted suicide in a state where that procedure is legal, but wait until after January 1. Good news: Legal assisted suicide is fully covered (no co-pay) for Republicans and Independents who voted for McCain.
There you go! The Democrat party looking out for the little guy as always!
Moon bats who voted for Barack Obama are obviously delighted that the U.S. Senate has approved the commie health scheme known as ObamaCare on the morn of Christmas Eve.
However, many are confused and do not realize that the House and Senate must reconcile any differences before a final bill can be submitted to the president. Others are not informed as to the effective dates and coverage terms.
The following list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) was hacked from DNC computers and shows the answers that Democrat voters are being fed:
Q: My next health insurance premium is due on January 5, 2010. Should I pay it, or will Obama handle it for me?
A: Registered Democrats and Independents who voted for ‘Bama are automatically covered as of 1/1/2010. President Obama has requested that instead of wasting more money on insurance premiums, these folks should make a generous, tax-deductible contribution to the Democrat party. Write “Ben Nelson-Mary Landrieu payoffs” on your check.
Registered Republicans and Independents who voted for John McCain will not be covered under ObamaCare until their 65th birthday or five years following the president’s signature, whichever comes first. Such people must continue to pay their overpriced premiums or risk a $5,000 annual fine and five years in jail.
Q: I am an illegal alien from Latin America who desperately needs transsexual surgery to align my sexual plumbing with my natural urges and instincts. I am bilingual, but only in Spanish and Mexican.
Am I covered, and when can I trade my useless penis for replacement parts that will set me free?
A: Good news, Pedro! As it turns out, you are covered as of 1/1/2010, just like the dopey American citizens who will end up paying for your switch.
To qualify, simply provide proof of your illegal alien status to the attending surgeon at least twenty minutes before anesthesia is administered.
One word of caution: Do not speak even a single word of English. Doing do may disqualify you immediately.
Q: I am eight plus months pregnant with twin boys. The father and I are not married and we have agreed that I will get an abortion. From a financial view, should we have the abortion in 2009 or wait until 2010?
A: We cannot dispense medical advice, but recommend that you ask your physician if he or she can guarantee that your brats will not pop out before January 1, 2010.
If premature delivery is not a risk, we advise waiting until mid-January to nuke the brats. By doing so, you will automatically qualify for the ObamaCare late-term rebate, which can save you thousands!
Q: Mother is 54 years old and in need of bypass heart surgery. She is still very active in GOP politics including her role as a top fundraiser for Sarah Palin. What are her options under ObamaCare?
A: We recommend that Mum apply for assisted suicide in a state where that procedure is legal, but wait until after January 1. Good news: Legal assisted suicide is fully covered (no co-pay) for Republicans and Independents who voted for McCain.
There you go! The Democrat party looking out for the little guy as always!
Tuesday, December 01, 2009
Marching off to Surrender?
By John W. Lillpop
With all due respect to President Obama, has there ever been a lamer, feebler, dumber, or weaker call to arms than his December 1 “surge” speech?
What must be going through the minds of those young American men and women who will soon be sent into harm’s at the behest of President Obama?
Commander-in-Chief Obama does not really appear committed to winning the war; rather, he seems preoccupied with exit strategies based on politics, including his own prospects for reelection.
Is that any way to run a war? Is that any way to manipulate the lives and limbs of young Americans in our military forces?
What must be going through the minds of Al-Quaeda operatives?
First, this president has all but granted citizenship to KSM and fellow terrorists by providing them with a world stage in New York City. Then the same president makes a token gesture to fulfill a campaign promise, a hollow effort which gives the enemy comfort in knowing the end date and game.
Nearly 70 Decembers ago, America’s naval fleet moored at Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese.
What if President Roosevelt had damned the Japanese for their hostile act of war, but committed America only to fight back until 1943, the year before the next presidential election?
Clearly, this president does not understand the importance of defeating Al-Quaeda and winning the war on terror, which he refuses to even acknowledge.
Obama’s “surge” is all about domestic politics, and protecting the interests of the Democrat party.
It is nothing short of a scandal that 30,000 additional Americans will be sent into battle by a Commander-in-Chief who is more concerned with defeating Republicans than destroying the enemy!
With all due respect to President Obama, has there ever been a lamer, feebler, dumber, or weaker call to arms than his December 1 “surge” speech?
What must be going through the minds of those young American men and women who will soon be sent into harm’s at the behest of President Obama?
Commander-in-Chief Obama does not really appear committed to winning the war; rather, he seems preoccupied with exit strategies based on politics, including his own prospects for reelection.
Is that any way to run a war? Is that any way to manipulate the lives and limbs of young Americans in our military forces?
What must be going through the minds of Al-Quaeda operatives?
First, this president has all but granted citizenship to KSM and fellow terrorists by providing them with a world stage in New York City. Then the same president makes a token gesture to fulfill a campaign promise, a hollow effort which gives the enemy comfort in knowing the end date and game.
Nearly 70 Decembers ago, America’s naval fleet moored at Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese.
What if President Roosevelt had damned the Japanese for their hostile act of war, but committed America only to fight back until 1943, the year before the next presidential election?
Clearly, this president does not understand the importance of defeating Al-Quaeda and winning the war on terror, which he refuses to even acknowledge.
Obama’s “surge” is all about domestic politics, and protecting the interests of the Democrat party.
It is nothing short of a scandal that 30,000 additional Americans will be sent into battle by a Commander-in-Chief who is more concerned with defeating Republicans than destroying the enemy!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)